The Coming Economic Collapse And The Next Great Depression

The Coming Economic Collapse And The Next Great Depression
The forgotten man painting by McNaughton (click image for video) I believe this image best exemplifies where we stand today, pun intended.

Total Pageviews

Monday, November 30, 2015


By Paul McGuire
November 25, 2015

Turn on the HD television and the global village theatre explodes into life. Stage left the actors appear; ISIS cells disrupt Paris, France and threaten Brussels. Armed troops, armored vehicles, and soldiers patrol European capitols. Stage right, tens of thousands of “extras,” Syrian refugees, continue to pour into Europe and the United States. Center stage tens of millions of people throughout the EU and the U.S. cry out on cue for more government protection from the terrorists, which means more armed troops patrolling the streets of Europe and even more surveillance. The socialized Europeans for the most part cannot conceive of the idea of being armed for self-protection, as they have been programmed to look to government as their protector. Colored blue and red lights light up the orchestra as the Wagnerian theatrical production begins at the Seat of Pergamos.

An actor walks to the center of the stage, playing the role of the Communist dictator and revolutionary from the past, Vladimir Lenin. The actor reads these exact quotes from Lenin:

“One of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the arming of the workers and the disarming of the bourgeoisie (the middle class).”

“One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”

“A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie. (Middle class)”

“The goal of socialism is communism.”

“A revolution is impossible without a revolutionary situation; furthermore, not every revolutionary situation leads to revolution.”

“Destroy the family, you destroy the country.”

The true nature of communism used to be fairly well understood in America. But now the mass media, politicians, and the educational system conceal the ugly truth from the people. The old expression, “those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it,” is all too true. Our media and educational system have deliberately dumbed down the masses and the average American has no knowledge of history. So they are completely ignorant of the game plan used by a Russian Communist revolutionary, Lenin, starting in 1917, which led to the murder of over 66 million people in Communist prison camps, made possible by Lenin’s strategy quoted above. Notice that at the very center of the Communist strategy is the passing of laws to take away the guns of the middle class through licensing and registration. Notice also how the Communists perfectly understand the power of gun ownership because one person with one gun can control one hundred people. Chinese Communist dictator Chairman Mao said it this way: “All political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” This is why before taking over Germany Adolph Hitler seized all the guns of the people.

Notice also that the Communists perfectly understand that before you can destroy a nation, you must destroy marriage and the family. The average person in America has forgotten or has never been told these truths. Do you think the sexual revolution, free sex, pornography, and the transgender movement championed by Bruce Jenner are just the product of random sexual evolution? Do you really think that the mass proliferation of pornography on the Internet is just about porno producers making money? The vast majority of porn on the Internet is free! Do you think it is accidental that grade school children are being sexualized with exposure to hard-core pornography in the public school systems, called “sex education,” and through the Internet?

All of this is about strategic social engineering with the goal of completely destroying the family unit! America is basically a socialist nation, but as Lenin stated, socialism is simply a means to bring in a Communist dictatorship. Socialism is Communism-lite. Finally, Lenin understood that in order to complete a revolution you must create a revolutionary situation, or manufactured crisis, which comes from the Illuminati term, “Order Out of Chaos.” The Communist plan is simply copied from the Illuminati Manifesto, a fact we document in our book, The Babylon Code.

“A revolution is impossible without a revolutionary situation; furthermore, not every revolutionary situation leads to revolution.” There are activists working at every level of American society in the media, entertainment, politics, education, law, religion, and medicine who are bringing about a manufactured crisis in order to produce a revolution. They want to destroy America as we know it, along with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights and move America into a socialist-communist global government under the rule of some global organization like the United Nations. The chaos we see at every level of American society in terms of economics, jobs being outsourced, illegal immigration, the dumbing down of future generations through Common Core and other programs in the education system, the moral chaos in films, television, and music, and the breakdown of our primary governmental and legal institutions is all designed to overwhelm the system. This overwhelming of the system is called the Cloward-Piven Strategy, named after two Columbia University Marxist professors.

At the center of this “New World Order Out of Chaos” is terrorism. Hitler and the Communist revolutionaries fully understood and used the public’s primal fear of terrorism to herd the masses in any direction they wanted. After the terrorist attack of 911, America was forever changed and many of our Constitutional freedoms were taken from us, supposedly in order to fight the war on terrorism. What we are seeing on the stage of this global theatre is the threat of terrorism being used to radically restructure the European Union into a police state…a police state that the European people are voluntarily crying out for. This is not an attempt to disparage the Europeans, but they have collectively been indoctrinated with socialism for the last 50 years. The European people have been socially engineered to see the government as their God, father, and protector. They are no longer capable of perceiving themselves a people who could be armed and protect themselves from terrorist attacks. They have become like sheep and Americans are also on their way to becoming sheep.

America is the last holdout in the world of a people who believe in God, the American “can do” attitude, and the U.S. Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the American way of life. Most Americans believe they have the Constitutional right to bear arms to defend themselves. As we can see from the above words of Lenin, this stands in the way of a World Socialist Government, which will eventually become a World Communist Government of the United Nations. So how do you create a revolutionary situation to radically change the beliefs of the American people? You use things like propaganda, social engineering, scientific mind control, psychological shock or trauma, drugs, and manufactured crisis.

Aldous Huxley wrote about this when he used the term Scientific Dictatorship and Brzezinski talked about the Technocratic Elite using psychotronic weapons on the masses. After World War II, the Dulles brothers, financed by Rockefeller, brought into the United States over 10,000 rocket and mind control scientists in what was called Operation Paper Clip. The Nazis had developed a scientific method of mind control using the drug LSD along with pain and hypnosis to program people into becoming “Manchurian Candidates.” This program was known as MK-ULTRA and it was used on tens of thousands of unsuspecting Americans. It also was used in conjunction with the British Tavistock Institute in artificially creating the sex, drugs, and rock’n’roll counter culture which was designed to destroy Judeo-Christian American values and the family unit.

You may doubt the existence of MK-ULTRA, but your children are being introduced to it subliminally. Simply watch the new movie Hunger Games Mockingjay Part 2, based on the novel by Suzanne Collins, who lives in Sandy Hook/Newtown, Connecticut. Suzanne Collins comes from a military family and in one scene in the film one of the heroes has been programmed through some kind of drug and brainwashing technique to kill the heroine of the film. When you listen closely to the actor’s lines, he talks about how they drugged him and made him watch what seems like photographic slide shows of his early family life as child, but then he says that he began to notice that they would slip in fake pictures of his childhood which created an entirely different reality of his past. The actor then goes on to say that he slowly began to recognize what they were doing because the fake pictures of his childhood did not look like the real ones, and they looked newer and shinier. He began to try to resist the programming, but he was still under mind control and feared that he could slip back at any moment and become an assassin, killing the heroine of the movie.

It is very odd that Suzanne Collins appears to have a great deal of knowledge about the MK-ULTRA program in the early days and how they used pictures and drugs like LSD to brainwash people into becoming killers. This novelist seems privy to the techniques of MK-ULTRA and writes a book which talks about the sacrifice of young children in Sandy Hook, the very place where a real shooter killed young children (if we can believe anything at all in the confused and contradictory news reports).

Another interesting thing to note is that the official name of the CIA mind control program designed to infiltrate the entertainment industry and media is called MOCKINGBIRD… and the title of the movie is MOCKINGJAY. Does that seem like a coincidence, or does someone very powerful have a twisted sense of humor?

Sirhan Sirhan repeatedly claimed that he was hypnotized and programmed to kill Robert Kennedy. In fact, his lawyers argued that he was forced to be a participant in the crimes because he was subjected to sophisticated hypnotic programming and memory implantation techniques. James Holmes, the “Batman” killer, was an honors student in neuroscience at the University of Colorado. Holmes was seeing a psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton, who worked for the Air Force and was allegedly known for dispensing dangerous drugs. The question remains: why did Dr. Fenton not alert the authorities after receiving, before the attack, a mailed notebook from Holmes with graphic details about how he was going to kill people?

It is reported that the alleged Oklahoma City bombing mastermind, Timothy McVeigh, was under the “care” of Dr. Louis Jolyon West of UCLA’s Neuropsychiatric Institute, following his arrest. Dr. West is reported to be deeply involved in scientific mind control. Although the CIA MK-ULTRA mind control program has been officially ended, there is something very suspicious about many of these killers, their backgrounds, the fact that they are on multiple psychiatric drugs, and the strange omissions in the time frames of their lives. In each case, the killer horrifically shoots and kills innocent people, which results in more calls for gun control. Yet, in many of these shootings (most of them in so-called “gun free zones”), if someone at a school, public facility, or church had simply had a gun, the mass killings could have been prevented, but the media conveniently ignores this.

So if we go back to the Communist revolutionaries’ obsession with disarming the law-abiding middle class as the primary precursor to a revolutionary take over it becomes clear why there may be some, apparently in high places, who would stop at nothing to create a series of escalating manufactured crises which would cause the masses of American people to ultimately demand gun control and the confiscation of all guns, simply because they are reacting emotionally and have no knowledge whatsoever of history.

Paranoia runs deep across America as reports of militant Islamic cells and militant Syrian refugees continue to surface. Many Americans believe it is important to exercise their Second Amendment rights in order to protect themselves and their families. Then, as if on cue, an unknown actor in the form of a “lone gunman” was arrested next to a Planned Parenthood facility in Colorado Springs, and Planned Parenthood labeled him a “White Christian Terrorist,” without a shred of evidence and it is not even certain that the man even had intentions to attack Planned Parenthood. All we know is that this strange man with the same Manchurian Candidate eyes as the other “shooters” who appear across the nation at strategic moments apparently lived in a cabin with no water or electricity, like the Manchurian Candidate, Theodore Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber.

Ted Kaczynski’s brother, David Kaczynski, reveals his suspicions that Ted was part of the MK-ULTRA mind control program beginning at 16 years old while he was attending Harvard University and then the University of Michigan and U.C. Stanford. The Colorado Springs shooter’s attack in the heart of an Evangelical Christian community which largely supports gun rights and is Pro-Life, prompted more calls for gun control from governmental authorities.

And, perfectly timed, this atrocity took place after several weeks of armed soldiers tracking down the terrorists in Paris, after the horrible shoot out at the Paris theater, and then armed troops patrolling Brussels. But, like the other shooters, much of the Colorado Springs gunman’s real personal background is sketchy, as if he came from nowhere, and then once again we see the same telltale vacant eyes of someone who appears to be under some kind of MK-ULTRA or Manchurian Candidate programming. If you review the list of these shooters and look at their photographs, they all have those vacant eyes we would expect with people who have been subjected to the old MK-ULTRA formula “pain, drugs and hypnosis,” which was first made public by, all of people science fiction writer and founder of the Church of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard.

Although I do not advocate the teachings of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard had some kind of experience with Naval Intelligence and worked in some kind of Naval Intelligence Unit with fellow science fiction writers like Robert Heinlein and Isaac Asimov. During Scientology auditing sessions, people are encouraged to uncover suppressed memories, such as the kind that could be planted into their subconscious through MK-ULTRA programming. Allegedly, Hubbard began to access this hidden programming in significantly large numbers of people and the Church of Scientology had to learn how to deal with it.

Large numbers of people enter the offices of psychologists, psychiatrists, pastors, prayer meetings and churches who in desperation admit that they are “hearing voices,” “suffering from the effects of implanted chips and implants, are being subjected to EMF brainwaves, and generally confess that they have been programmed by the government. Tragically, the vast majority of these people are rejected, laughed at, and dismissed as nuts, and their stories are flatly rejected. To compound their enormous pain and suffering, the act of being rejected and not believed by those from whom they seek help is often the straw that breaks the camel’s back and they are driven into despair, depression, and suicide. I hear stories from the victims of mind control who are treated like nuts and rejected by Christian churches and pastors. The same thing happens to the victims of Satanic ritual abuse who seek help. Although there maybe a certain percentage that suffer from psychiatric illnesses, the vast majority of these people have been subjected to myriad forms of scientific mind control. They need to be accepted with the love of Jesus Christ, supernaturally delivered by the Holy Spirit, and welcomed with love into a Christian community!

Psychiatric and psychological professionals along with pastors and churches and society in general must be taught about scientific mind control, targeted individuals, EMF waves, and other pyschotronic technologies, along with Satanic ritual abuse. They must be trained, equipped, and prepared to welcome and be available to these people, instead of treating them like they have leprosy.

Again, I am not a Scientologist, but many Scientologists are trained to recognize this problem. Scientology’s Citizen Commission on Human Rights publishes magazines and videos, which are distributed to millions, educating people to the reality of MK-ULTRA scientific mind control, along with its history and how to become free of it.

The time has come to stop watching every shooter blow away people on television and simply accept the official false narrative. There is something going on here far deeper than what we are being told and the media are complicit in the cover-up because they are withholding the facts. Read about Lenin’s game plan and simply add to that the modern science of mind control. It could be these shooters are not just crazy, but that something far more sinister is going on. At the very least we need to know the facts!

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Here is an explanation of the Syrian war. Good Guys, Bad Guys, Get it Good or Bad, Depends!

Remembering that the so called rebels (mostly foreigners from jihadist Arab countries and the caucus were financed and armed to the teeth by Saudi Arabia and powers that be,( have brought mayhem and utter chaos throughout the faith) here is the summary of the convoluted state of affairs:

A highly restricted briefing paper on Syria:

President Assad (who is bad) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels (who are good) started winning (Hurrah!). But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State (who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy (who are still good).

So the Americans (who are good) started bombing Islamic State (who are bad) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels (who are good) so they could fight Assad (who is still bad) which was good.

By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS (which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they’re good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.

Getting back to Syria.

So President Putin (who is bad, ‘cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks (including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) by attacking IS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing? But Putin (still bad) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good).

Now Iran (who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel, are now good ) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad (still bad) as are the Russians (bad) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.

So a Coalition of Assad (still bad), Putin (extra bad) and the Iranians (good, but in a bad sort of way) are going to attack IS (who are bad) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels (who are good) which is bad.

Now the British (obviously good, except that nice Mr Corbyn in the corduroy jacket, who is probably bad and the Americans (also good) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good/bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).

So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America (still Good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that nice man Ayatollah in Iran (also Good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS (still the only constantly bad group).

To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims (Assad and Iran) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good (Doh!).

Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal (mmm…might have a point…) and hence we will be seen as Bad.

So now we have America (now bad) and Britain (also bad) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (Good/bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also Good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, Good) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?

I hope that clears things up for you.

All the best,
CIGA Riyaz ( probably good but do not jump to judgment just yet)

Friday, November 20, 2015

Divide and Conquer Strategy

We need to Stop blaming Muslims and Christians for the acts of
Governments who are using Religion for there own political agenda.
"Leaders" equal "Globalists"
Do the Globalists Not use the Divide strategy to Conquer?
Muslims vs Christians
Republican vs Democrat
Black vs White
Gay vs Straight
Rich vs Poor
Left vs Right
Woman's right vs Men's Right

We all need to wake up to see who the real Enemy of Freedom is
before it is to Late.

ISIS is NOT all Muslim's
Political leaders and modern Church's (that claim bombing the
Middle east is good) are NOT Christian's

If We can not "Separate" ISIS from Muslim's then how is it that we
"Separate" america from its leaders that say they are Christians?
Or "Talmudic" Israel from its leaders? are all Jews, Muslims,
Christians Radical?
Then who is the real enemy? Are Not most of the "Leaders"
dividing these groups?

The "Globalists" are using Muslims to divide Christians and Muslims.
Muslims see the constant bombing of there country from "Christian Nations"
And Christians see an Invasion of there Country's from Muslims country's.
I would have to surmise that the "Leaders" that are Dividing all these
groups are the real enemy of humanity what is it they are trying to accomplish?
Because the path they have us all on is the next World War.

It does not matter what these so called leaders profess to be
Christian, Jewish, Muslium only are they supporting a Global Power
that will lead to WW3.

ISIS is composed of mostly radicalized Saudi Arabian
Sunni Muslims, And Created and funded From the Following:
British intelligence (MI6)
Israeli Mossad
Saudi Arabia General Intelligence Presidency (GIP, equivalent to US CIA)
Turkey's National Intelligence Organization (MIT, equivalent to US CIA)

This list are "Globalist" who would like to have the Middle East
controlled by them and this includes Syria and Iran.
(As well as the rest of the planet.)

This list does not represent the the beliefs of most of Christians or Muslims(Shias)

Complicit in the on going Agenda of ISIS and never ending WARS is the
Major Media that control 90% of American Media
(6 corporations that are owned and controlled by the Globalists)
News Corp
Time Warner

And for the record yes we need to secure our own borders.

more info please see these.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

12 Signs you might NOT be in A Christian Church

1) Super Fun Rock Band Church , if you can NOT tell the difference
from a rock concert and your worship service,
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.

2) Gay marriage, If your pastor is willing to preform gay marriage
because the Supreme Court says so. And has stopped the fight on
Abortion because of Supreme Court Roe vs Wade
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.

3) If you are NOT challenged or offended at least once a month.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.
John 15:2

4) Romans 13, If your Pastor misinterprets Romans 13 that you to obey
the Government no matter what.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.

5) Guns, If your Pastor tells you that you do NOT have the Natural
Right to self defense to protect you and your family.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.
Luke 22:36

6) If your Pastor takes the 501(c)3 tax deduction and is beholden to
the IRS for what he can say and what he can NOT say.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.
Not only is this unbiblical it is goes against "The Bill of Rights"
and the First amendment freedom of speech and freedom of
Mark 12:17

7) The 10 commandments are only suggestions, Or any part of the Bible
is not GOD ordained including All His Commandments.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.
Deuteronomy 4:2, Rev 22:19

8) That Christ and Liberty are NOT Unanimous.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.
John 8:36 , James 1:25, 2 Corinthians 3:17

9) Bomb the hell out of the middle east.
Really must this even be said.
preemptive wars do NOT equal peace
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.

10) Israel we must be defended at all costs, even at the expense our own country.
neither Greek of Jew all are saved by Christ and him alone
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.

11) More money is awarded to buildings, kids programs, athletic
programs and gyms, then spreading and teaching the Gospel,
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.
Mark 10:25

12) If your Church advocates for closing mosques,
then what makes you think that they would not close
all religions intuitions, including your Church next.
Chances you might NOT be in a Christian Church.

The Paris Attacks

By Chuck Baldwin
November 19, 2015

Paris, France: Muslim terrorists took the lives of over 120 people. Here are my observations:

I am aghast and flummoxed at the number of Americans who just cannot seem to comprehend the culpability that the U.S. government has in all of this. This only makes sense when one takes into account that the vast majority of Americans only know what the mainstream media tells them. And, without question, our mainstream media is nothing more than a propaganda ministry for Washington, D.C. Without a doubt, the controlled major media in America rivals the controlled major media of Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Soviet Union.

Make no mistake about it: the wars in the Middle East are Washington’s wars. The refugee crisis is the direct result of Washington’s wars. G.W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and the continued violent attacks by the Obama administration throughout the Middle East--not to mention, the direct intervention of, and supervision by, the CIA, British intelligence, the Israeli Mossad, and the governments of Turkey and Saudi Arabia--created ISIS. Furthermore, these governmental entities have all helped to arm, sustain, equip, supply--and medically care for--ISIS terrorists.

One needs to understand that violent Muslims have been killing other Muslims for centuries. In fact, the vast majority of the people killed by violent Muslims are other Muslims--NOT Christians and Jews. What happened in Paris happens routinely in Syria.

ISIS is composed of mostly radicalized Saudi Arabian Sunni Muslims. The goal is to dispose of President Assad’s government in Syria as a stepping stone to conquering both Syria and Iran, thus turning those Shia Muslim nations into Sunni Muslim nations. The result of which means Saudi Arabia’s King Salman will become the de facto king of the entire Middle East. It would also mean that King Salman (already the richest man in the world) would single-handedly control the oil of the entire Middle East. And as everyone should already know, King Salman is in the harlot’s bed with virtually the entire western banking and petroleum worlds.

In addition, please understand that Washington’s wars have created hundreds of thousands of grieving Muslim mothers who have watched Bush and Obama’s bombers and drones take the lives of their sons and daughters--AND THEY ARE MAD! The families of these deceased grandfathers, grandmothers, fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, and cousins have made ISIS recruitment EASY. These people know that the western alliance is behind these deaths and they want justice. Tell me we would react differently if the deaths were members of our families.

Neocons and globalists in Washington, D.C., are using the Shia Muslim people as the proverbial straw man to topple the governments in Iran and Syria, because those Shia Muslim nations care absolutely nothing about getting in bed with the international traders who want to further enrich themselves from the profits that can be made in those countries. The only one who is seriously making war against ISIS is Russia’s Vladimir Putin. And his efforts against the Sunni terrorists began but just weeks ago.

The refugee crisis is a tool of globalists to destabilize the West and help usher in a global Police State. Again, the goal is a global economic system. The Federal Reserve has taken the U.S. and European economies to the brink of collapse. The only thing that globalists can do to circumvent this inevitable collapse is create global panic, global war, and a global Police State. A Europe and America invaded with angry Muslims is just the antidote.

Please understand that the vast majority of refugees are NOT terrorists. They are persecuted Muslims and Christians (and others) who are literally fleeing for their lives. But there is no question that CIA-backed Sunni terrorists have infiltrated these refugees.

Ask yourself, why would refugees seeking safety and protection in other countries want to murder hundreds of citizens within those countries? They know this would completely alienate the country against them and only serve to further endanger the lives of their families. The attacks in Paris were NOT committed by refugees; they were committed by CIA-backed, Saudi-backed, Mossad-backed, Turkey-backed, MI6-backed ISIS terrorists.

Even though the majority of refugees are doubtless harmless people who did not want to leave their homes and did so only for their very survival--and with the knowledge that western operatives have created a radical Muslim Frankenstein--and given the fact that our federal government is making no attempt to vet these refugees, it is foolish for states to accept them. Governors are right to refuse. (If the U.S. government was truly behaving in the interests of peace and was not an active participant in creating war and instability in the Middle East--and thus creating the refugee crisis to begin with--it would be a different story.)

In addition, how did those terrorists successfully pull off these coordinated attacks? How did they get fully-automatic rifles and bombs into Paris? These sand people are NOT that sophisticated. They do NOT have those kinds of connections. Do you think you could successfully get a group of people together and smuggle dozens of automatic weapons and explosives into a European country--and then successfully coordinate a large-scale attack in a high-security major downtown city? The only people capable of such a thing are Special Ops military personnel. In other words, ISIS had help, folks--a LOT of help.

Furthermore, I believe the mainstream media and Washington politicians are setting America up for another 9/11-type attack. Following the Paris attacks, CIA director John Brennan wasted no time saying that ISIS was preparing more attacks against the West. He also criticized America’s privacy protections--meaning the Fourth Amendment and similar impediments to government encroachment of our liberties.

See the report:

CIA Chief Criticises Recent Surveillance Rollbacks In Wake Of Paris Attacks

Really, Mr. Brennan? If you are truly concerned about future terrorist attacks in the United States, why are you not using the power of your agency to help secure America’s borders? After 9/11, the U.S. government did NOTHING to secure our borders. And to this day, our borders are an open sieve. And you, Mr. Brennan, helped to create thousands of additional terrorists; you helped arm them, supply them, and sent Special Ops to help train them. And all you can say to the American people is that we must surrender whatever protections against governmental encroachment we have left? Do you take us for fools?

And when this next terrorist attack against the U.S. occurs, Washington politicians and their toadies in the mainstream media--along with thousands of Christian “leaders”--will blame Islam. They won’t give a second thought to who the real war-makers are.

A well-traveled friend from Germany wrote this in a private email, “The propagation that Muslims in general are thriving to take over the world is mostly radical Christian propaganda and paranoia with the clear intent to pursue their own political agenda and capitalize on fears in the general public. For instance, if you travel through Iran today, the general public is very pro west. The majority of the Iranian people seem to regard their religious leaders with great skepticism. Also, just look at the numbers: there are worldwide about 50% more Christians than Muslims. Militarily, Christian countries outnumber Muslims countries in weapons and forces easily by 20 to one--and this is not even assessing the quality of the weapons. The United States alone has more fighter jets than all Muslim countries put together by a wide margin. And most of the Muslims countries are allies of the Christian west.

“The uprising of ISIS is a direct result of Bush’s [and Obama’s] war on terror. Terrorism is always a type of guerrilla warfare. It cannot take over western countries for lack of organizational structure. It rises in an area of power vacuum as a structured opposition is lacking. The goal of terrorism is to initiate fear, to taunt powers and destabilize existing political structures. They succeed if radical groups spread the fear of the Muslim religion. This then destabilizes the political structure in western countries with radical parties rising. Since ISIS, the neo-Nazis have gained popularity in Germany. The attempt of Muslim terrorism is not to take over the USA or Germany. It is to create enough fear and political opposition in these countries that weakens their resolve to interfere on the ground in countries like Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.

“Also when thinking of Islam as a religion with world conquering ambitions: there have been major Christian communities all over the Arab world since Islam was founded. Lebanon is mostly Christian. Parts of Turkey, Iraq and Syria are Christian settled and have been for a thousand years or more. The Muslims had centuries to get rid of them but they haven’t. Some of the Christians communities are enclaves totally surrounded by Muslim groups that have peacefully coexisted for hundreds of years. That speaks more for religious tolerance than the reverse.”

I bet the vast majority of readers have never heard nor read about the fact that Christians and Muslims are fighting side-by-side against ISIS in Syria, have you? You haven’t read that NO ONE in the West or in Israel is helping the Assyrian Christian Army in Syria, have you? You haven’t heard that Iran is helping to provide medical assistance and support to the Christians fighting ISIS in Syria, have you? You haven’t heard that Assad’s army in Syria is assisting the Christians in their fight against ISIS, have you? No, you haven’t. The U.S. media and Washington politicians don’t want to tell you about that. It might undermine the anti-Muslim, anti-Iran, anti-Syria propaganda that they have been dishing out 24/7 for the last fourteen years.

See these reports:

Christians, Muslims, Assad Troops Fight As One To Defend Biblical Town From ISIS

Exclusive: Christian Army Fighting ISIS Pleads For U.S. Support: ‘We’re Done’

Note that even though Breitbart should be credited for publishing the above reports, they continue to regurgitate the anti-Assad, anti-Iran propaganda. However, this bias doesn’t change the truth of the efforts of Christians and Muslims fighting together in Syria against ISIS that Breitbart admirably reports. You didn’t hear about this on FOX News, did you?

Then there is this: the first thing the president of France did following the terrorist attacks in Paris was to close the French borders. DUH! I think the fox is already in the henhouse.

Folks, let’s get real: if it wasn’t for Donald Trump, there would not even be a national discussion about America’s illegal immigration problem. However, the one disturbing element to Trump’s rhetoric regarding immigration is his statements that, as president, he would seriously consider closing mosques.

Again, Islam is NOT the problem. We have had mosques in the United States since at least 1929. And there are nearly 3,200 mosques currently in the United States. And none of them has been identified as producing terrorist attacks in America. The terrorists that did participate in the attacks on 9/11 were not even from the United States. They were from SAUDI ARABIA. If we were going to attack a Muslim nation in retaliation for 9/11, why didn’t we attack Saudi Arabia? Come on, folks. Are things not starting to add up?

Either we have freedom of religion for all or we have it for none. The problem with the rise of Islam in America can only be laid at the doorstep of the Christian Church. If our pastors and churches were doing the job they should be doing of making Christianity relevant to life today (including our political life), the American people would not be losing interest in Christianity, and the spiritual void that other religions (including Islam) are filling would not even exist. THAT problem is NOT an immigration problem or a political problem at all. THAT problem is a spiritual problem. And only our pastors and churches can solve that problem, but they refuse to do it.

Plus, America’s churches are more glorified social clubs than they are anything else. Far, far too many of America’s pastors are more concerned about being politically-correct CEOs or Joel Osteen wannabes than they are about being watchmen and shepherds. It has been a long, long time since a majority of America’s churches were a “pillar and ground of the truth.” (I Tim. 3:15) The rise of false religions is merely God’s judgment on the Church for abandoning truth. When truth is abandoned, does it really matter which version of error takes its place? Christians need to look themselves in the mirror and stop blaming the country’s ills on Muslims.

If a president can close mosques, he can close synagogues and churches. Talk about opening Pandora’s Box!

But there is another element to the Paris attacks: remember that France--and most of Europe--is a giant gun-free zone. Think about it: a handful of armed terrorists sent tens of thousands of French males into panic like kitty cats in a thunderstorm. European governments (except for Switzerland) have successfully stolen the manhood from the male citizens of that continent. The Natural instinct of men is to FIGHT for their families, their friends, and their communities. But for more than a half-century, socialist governments have indoctrinated men to believe that they must depend on government to protect their families, friends, and communities. Men are not allowed to defend themselves. They are stripped, not only of the means of self-defense, but of the mindset of self-defense. They are like a thousand Wildebeests running away from a half-dozen lions. And that’s exactly what globalists want to see happen in the United States. And in many respects, it has ALREADY happened in the United States.

For all intents and purposes, many states and cities in America are gun-free zones. Men and women are not allowed to defend themselves. The media constantly bombards the minds of the American people with the philosophy that we must depend on government to defend us. Government personnel are always called “first responders.” They are NOT first responders. Private American citizens at the scene are the first responders. By the time government employees show up, most of the damage is already done.

Had the French government not stripped the French people of their ability to defend themselves--and had the males of Paris not lost the mental awareness and mental toughness necessary to defend themselves--the loss of life in Paris would have been much less.

At about the same time that a disarmed Paris was being turned into a bloodbath, the Greensboro, North Carolina, Police Department was teaming up with Destiny Christian Center to ask residents to sign a “Pledge of Non-Violence” and to turn in their guns. Once again, we find American police agencies and state churches (via their 501c3 non-profit organization status) teaming up to try and disarm the American citizenry. No doubt, the pastor of this so-called church quoted Romans 13 to justify this Hitlerian conduct.

Here is the report:

Greensboro Police Asks Residents To Sign Pledge, Turn In Guns

So, here would be my response if a police agency requested that I ask my fellowship to participate in such an activity (ha ha):

“First, Mr. Police Chief, will your department take a ‘Pledge of Non-Violence’ and turn in its guns?

“Every day, policemen throughout America commit acts of violence including the use of firearms. Let's assume for a minute that violence was justified in every single instance (which it's not). Why is it right and proper for a policeman to violently use a firearm in self-defense and not a citizen? Does not the Natural Law of self-defense apply equally to every human being, regardless of profession? Are policemen a privileged class?

“Second, Mr. Police Chief, do you really expect the criminal class in our community to sign a ‘Pledge of Non-Violence’ and turn in their guns?

“It is proven beyond all reasonable doubt (by reasonable people) that a disarmed society only encourages violence. Asking non-violent people to disarm doesn't discourage violence; it invites it.

“These pledges of non-violence and appeals for citizen disarmament are NOT intended to reduce crime; they are intended to make the populace more dependent on government. It's not about crime; it's about control.

“Mr. Police Chief, I respectfully decline your invitation. In fact, I think I will encourage the attendees of my fellowship this Sunday to go out and purchase a firearm. Oh, and I don't advise that your police department disarm either.”

The Paris attacks, the refugee crisis, ISIS, a world on the verge of global war: it’s all a manipulated contrivance of the globalist elite to eviscerate freedom and usher in Huxley’s “Brave New World,” aka George H.W. Bush’s “New World Order.” Folks, get your eyes off of the Wizard and start looking for the man (men) behind the curtain, because that’s the real enemy.

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Steering The Masses Towards Total War

By Larry Chin
Global Research, November 16, 2015
It goes without saying that the atrocities of Paris on November 13, 2015 were unspeakable and sickening. But what is not being said in the wake of the incident—what has been ignored by the mass media—is predictably telling and ominous.

Just it was in the wake of 9/11, the people of the world are being provoked, agitated and mobilized; the fear, horror, rage and shock channeled and shaped into wave of collective vengeance and hatred. Hatred towards what and whom?

The Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attacks. But what is the Islamic State?

The fact that remains willfully unacknowledged is that Islamic State is the guided military-intelligence and political apparatus of the West, created, trained, financed, advised and protected by the West and NATO—including France.

The Islamic State and Islamic extremism, including Al-Qaeda, functions on behalf of NATO and Western geostrategic interests.

The intelligence agencies of the West and NATO, led by the CIA, MI-6, the Mossad, the Pakistani ISI, etc. run the Islamic State terrorists.

Jihadist terrorism would not exist without the nurturing of the West, which started with the Cold War, continued into the conflicts in the Balkans, and exploded with 9/11 and the “war on terrorism”, and continues to metastasize with the so-called war on the Islamic State, a rebranded continuation of the same fabricated criminal war of deception.

The West and its architects of war are ultimately responsible for all acts of terrorism perpetrated by their own terrorist shock troops.

As noted by Michel Chossudovsky,

“the notion that the Paris attack was an act of retribution and revenge directed against France is questionable and contradictory inasmuch as the evidence confirms that France has been channeling weapons to jihadist rebels in Syria including Al Nusrah and ISIS.”

What if it was “blowback”? What if the Paris terrorists went “rogue” and attacked their own sponsors? What if these terrorist cells were “out of control”? What if these and other groups are simply “going berserk” for “inexplicable reasons”? What if one accepts the (highly unlikely) notion that the CIA, the NSA, French intelligence, the Mossad, etc. —agencies with the most sophisticated spying capabilities on the planet—suddenly and simultaneously lost track of everything? There are red herrings. The West is still responsible for the actions of its assets. The West has not “lost control” of the Islamic State. In fact, the terrorists are being run with remarkable efficiency and effectiveness. The chaos and plunder are not random. The atrocities are designed. Were it not for unwelcome Russian “interference”, the Anglo-American empire would now control more geography than it already does. The Syrian regime arguably might have fallen.

Anglo-American war policy is what has set terrorism loose. It continues to sow, foment and expand terrorism in an unimaginable scale, with no end in sight. The trail of blood leads back to the policy, and its policy makers.

This apocalyptic crisis is not a war “on” terror, but a war “of” terror, committed by terrorists, guided by terrorists, and psychopathic war criminals that operate beyond the reach of law.

Stopping terrorism is not the real agenda. In fact, the opposite: the West’s terrorist armies are key assets used to infiltrate and destabilize, to topple the regimes that NATO seeks to co-opt, invade and conquer. One by one they fall in this manner, from Iraq and Libya to what is unfolding now in Syria, towards the even greater agenda.

The “war on the Islamic State” is not even about the Islamic State, no matter what horrific acts are committed by the ISIS/ISIL killers themselves. The war is, and has always been, a superpower world war pitting the West against Russia and China, everywhere Western geostrategic/resource/corporate interests dictate.

The “spectacular” bloodshed—the unspeakable scale and intensity of the murder—will only become more outlandish and “creative”, as the war planners become increasingly desperate to keep the easily distracted masses in home countries galvanized and fearful, and militantly supportive of the larger war agenda, and deepening involvement on the front lines.

Who benefits? Who benefits from weaponizing France and its people? The same forces that have benefitted from all such atrocities since 9/11. All of the governments that are aiming to destabilize, invade, and conquer the Eurasian subcontinent, including the Middle East and Central Asia, and beyond. All of the governments seeking regime change in Syria: NATO.

The operatic expressions of remorse on behalf of officials hide the realpolitik; the cold, calculating sociopathy that views war as industry, mass murder as a means to “victory”, and slaughter of innocents as “necessary collateral damage”. Three thousand dead on 9/11. A jetliner full of Russian tourists. Tens of thousands across the killing fields of the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa. More than one hundred snuffed out in Paris. All in a day’s work.

The current line justified by the bloody headlines and propaganda is that even more endless “total war” must be waged. President Hollande now channels Dick Cheney’s “war that will not end in our lifetimes”, and George W. Bush’s “with us or against us”.

Paris proves, according to the propaganda, that time is overdue for regime change in Syria. Syria, the “hotbed” of terrorism, where the Islamic State is “out of control”. The Assad regime has “failed to stop it”; therefore the Assad regime must be “taken out” along with the “terrorists”.

It is no coincidence that Paris has prompted President Barack Obama to promise an escalation of military involvement in Syria. More accurately, the justification to openly invade Syria has been given the green light. The “boots on the ground” invasion of Syria, which is already underway, is now accelerated. Obama undoubtedly wants to finish the job before he leaves office in 2016. A new series of air strikes on Raqqa, Syria began less than 48 hours after the Paris attacks.

What of the Paris attacks themselves? The official narrative is being created. Although it is early in the process, questions about the Paris attack are mounting. The similarities to the false flag operation of 9/11 are abundant.

Quoting the New York Times, it “remains unclear how a plot of such sophistication and lethality escaped the notice of intelligence agencies, both in France and abroad.” But emerging evidence suggests that the intelligence agencies not only knew, but knew enough to prepare for the attacks, which suggests that they were allowed to happen.

France had foreknowledge of imminent attacks and preparations were underway weeks before November 13th, including emergency meetings with CIA director John Brenanan, and unusual advanced preparation of first responders—who happened to be ready in Paris on November 13th.

A massive cyberattack—one beyond the capabilities of the terrorists–took down French security systems prior to and during the incident.

French officials knew the attackers and were tracking them continuously for a significant period, yet did nothing to stop them.

From the orchestration and execution of the atrocities themselves, to the response, to the reaction, the signs of long planning, scripting, choreography, and calculation are evident.

There will be incompetence excuses (“we were caught off guard”), hopelessness and chaos excuses (“we cannot predict nor stop anything”), and other variations. But they fail to explain evidence to the contrary.

According to the CIA operatives, think tank “terrorism experts”, and other warmongering blowhards that spewed nonsense nonstop on CNN all day and all night following the Paris attacks, another “new normal” has been set.

All such brainwashing must be resisted.

The larger context must not be lost amidst chaos and panic.

It is the war itself—its architects as well as its murdering operatives—that must be condemned.

The killers who coldly executed innocent people acted on orders from handlers. The handlers themselves had handlers. And they in turn took orders from individuals occupying high positions of power. It is these individuals who must be identified and exposed; their war agenda resisted and stopped. For the sake of what is left of humanity.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

The False Flag Link: Syrian Passport "Found" Next To Suicide Bomber Was "Definitely A Forgery"

Submitted by Tyler Durden zerohedge on 11/15/2015
Yesterday, when we explained just how the tragic events in France over the past 48 hours unfolded precisely as we predicted they would two months ago (ironically, as per our post from September 11, 2015) we commented on the oddly fortuitous discovery of an intact Syrian passport found next to the body of one of the suicide bombers, a passport which Greece chimed in as belonging to a Syrian refugee who had entered the country at Leros on October 3, 2015 from where he subsequently travelled all the way to Paris.

Specifically, we said that "we admit to not being experts on the nuances, or even basics, of "suicide bombing for terrorists 101", but is bringing your own passport to an event that will be your last, really that crucial, especially when the passport is such a critical smoking gun?"

The following cartoon best captures the idiocy of anyone actually believing a suicide bomber would have brought their actual passport to what they knew would be their last act on earth.

Shortly thereafter, it was Serbia's turn to join the story of the rogue "Syrian refugee", when the Serbian newspaper Blic published the picture of the alleged Syrian passport belonging to a 25-year-old man named Ahmed Almohamed, and said he had crossed into the country on 7 October, having arrived four days earlier in Leros, Greece, seeking Serbian refugee status.

Then a Greek newspaper, Protothema, said he was travelling with a second man, Mohammed Almuhamed, and published pictures purporting to show their travel documents. The Guardian proposed the following map to track Ahma's progress across Europe:

And then a few hours ago, the story took an even more surreal twist when we learned that, according to both French and US sources, the passport was "definitely a forgery."

The Int'l Spectator
BREAKING: French police source says Syrian passports are 'definitely forgeries' and fakes can be purchased easily for few hundred dollars.

Some more details courtesy of IBTimes:

The Syrian passport recovered from near one of the Paris attackers may be fake, a US intelligence official told CBS news. The document did not contain the correct numbers for a legitimate Syrian passport and the picture did not match the name, said the official.

The passport found near the body of one of the eight attackers who struck on Friday, 13 November, was used to enter the European Union through Greece in October. The Serbian interior ministry said that the passport was used to enter that country on 7 October, by a man claiming refugee status.
So how to make sense from a story that has drifted from the merely laughable, to the bizarre, to the outright surreal? Guardian's Patrick Kingsley attempts an explanation:

There are several reasons why it’s worth waiting until all the facts are known before making too strong a link between the attacks and the refugee crisis. The first is a general one: on at least 12 occasions, Isis has actually criticised refugees for fleeing to Europe. “For those who want to blame the attacks on Paris on refugees, you might want to get your facts straight,” wrote Aaron Zelin, an analyst of jihad, in an online commentary about the 12 outbursts. “The reality is, [Isis] loathes that individuals are fleeing Syria for Europe. It undermines [Isis’s] message that its self-styled caliphate is a refuge.” It’s therefore unlikely that the vast majority of Syrians fleeing to Europe are Isis supporters, since their actions are in obvious contravention of the group’s creed.

The second reason for caution is more specific. Investigators still need to verify the Syrian passport was carried by an attacker rather than a dead bystander (one Egyptian passport-holder initially believed to be an assailant turned out to be an injured victim). They will then need to be certain that the passport’s carrier was the same as the passport’s legitimate owner.

It’s possible that it was stolen. Since the possession of a Syrian passport makes it easier to claim asylum in Europe, there is a busy trade in stolen Syrian documents. Syrians interviewed on Greece’s border with Macedonia have described how they were mugged for their passports after leaving the Greek islands as they tried to make their way north through the Balkans. Such passports can be sold on for as much as several thousand euros, in a trade that the EU’s border agency acknowledges is a growing problem. Forgeries are also common; a Dutch journalist recently had one made in the name of his prime minister.

A third red flag is the fact that the passport concerned was found in the first place. Analysts find it strange that a bomber would remember to bring his passport on a mission, particularly one who does not intend to return alive. “Why would a jihadist who expressly rejects all notions of modern citizenship take his passport on a suicide mission?” tweeted Charlie Winter, an analyst focusing on Islamist extremism. “So it gets found.”
One theory is that Isis hopes to turn Europe against Syrian refugees. This would reinforce the idea of unresolvable divisions between east and west, and Christians and Muslims, and so persuade Syrians that Islamic State’s self-proclaimed caliphate is their best hope of protection. “You know what pissed off Islamist extremists the most about Europe?” summarised Iyad El-Baghdadi, an activist and jihadi-watcher, on Twitter. “It was watching their very humane, moral response to the refugee crisis.”
His conclusion:

"Whether the passport was planted, stolen, forged or genuine, investigators should find out the truth soon enough. But regardless of what they discover, a wider debate has now begun about the wisdom of letting so many unknown migrants enter Europe through its southern borders, and being allowed to move onwards through the continent with few restrictions. Already, there are calls to step up the policing of Greece’s maritime border with Turkey, and to block the passage of refugees entirely."
What is becoming clear is that either the passport was planted, or is a fake, or both. But while we agree with the Guardian that this shift in narrative will have an impact against the future flow of refugees into Europe, an even more acute consequence will from the "Syrian" angle will be to "incept" the idea that the entire Paris massacre was the result of events in Syria (and hence, al Assad is directly and indirectly responsible) thus generating goodwill toward a military operation that include a French ground force. In fact, the wheels are already in motion:

France may send its "expeditionary force" to Syria in order to retaliate against ISIL, according to the US-based intelligence firm Stratfor; the group has claimed responsibility for Friday's terrorist attacks in Paris, which claimed at least 129 lives.

Analysts from the private intelligence company Stratfor believe that France may send its "expeditionary force" to Syria or Iraq in response to the deadly Paris attacks that rocked the French capital on Friday night. They claimed that France has a whole array of options for retaliation "at its disposal", but that the country's response will depend on "who was ultimately responsible" for the Friday attacks.

"If it is found that the Islamic State core group was indeed behind the November 13 attack, France will likely ramp up its Syrian air operations," Stratfor said.

In light of this, Stratfor analysts predicted that France may increase its programs to train and support anti-Islamic State forces in Iraq and Syria, or even to carry out "commando strikes against key leadership nodes."

"France also has the option of deploying an expeditionary force like it did in the Sahel [region of Africa], although that would probably require outside airlift capacity from NATO allies, especially the United States," Stratfor pointed out.
And the latest surprise, is that moments ago it was Greece again which claimed that despite allegations to the contrary, the passport was, in fact, real. How it "concluded" this remains a mystery...

... and once again shows that there is a deep political motive on virtually every side to use this human tragedy as a "false flag" event to achieve specific, geopolitical goals.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

What is a Neocon?

Chuck Baldwin 11/10/15

By Chuck Baldwin
November 12, 2015

The word “neocon” has become a common term in our political lexicon. However, I don’t think most conservatives truly understand its definition.

First, people need to understand that many neocons call themselves “conservative” on domestic social issues. Not all neocons are truly conservative on these issues--some aren’t. But many neocons DO trumpet themselves as socially “conservative.” These folks like to identify themselves as “pro-life” or “pro-family” or “pro-defense” or “pro-limited government,” etc. But these titles are mostly meaningless.

At this point, it is imperative that we understand how politicians in Washington, D.C., operate. Here is a quick primer: Congressional leaders know which congressmen and senators are controllable--and most of them are. Only a handful of our federal congressmen and senators are “untouchable.” My guess is less than 100 out of the 535 House members and U.S. senators are truly NOT controlled--and that includes liberals and conservatives.

The vast majority of our congressmen and senators are either morally tainted, which make them prime targets for bribery and manipulation (can anyone say former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert?), or they are egotistical, ambition-driven narcissists who will do most anything to advance their careers (this is the largest group, in my opinion.)

Before ANY vote is cast in Congress, leaders take note of the political makeup of the districts and states that elected their representatives. Was he or she elected by a liberal or conservative district? What are the issues at home that the legislator campaigned on? All of this is readily known by congressional leaders.

Heads are counted before voting to test whether a given bill will comfortably pass or not. If there is a comfortable margin of support for a bill, members who come from a district with opposing views can vote according to the way that will keep the constituents back home happy. Only if a bill’s passage is so close that it requires members to vote against the will of their constituents will they be asked to do so. And the ones who are controlled WILL vote with their congressional leadership--regardless of how much it riles up the constituents back home. Of course, leadership has professionals that will coach the legislator on how to explain the bad vote to the people back home. And, since most votes are not that close, these tactics are not always required and the legislator’s voting record can appear “very good” to the folks back home. That’s how you come up with these congressional scorecards. When legislators vote against their constituents on a bill, you can mark it down: congressional leaders required the cooperation of the legislator or senator--and the legislator caved to the pressure. That’s how you know that the congressman or senator is controlled.

Again, there is only a small handful of congressmen and senators who are untouchable and will vote their convictions--and the convictions of the people they represent. (Controlled congressmen and senators don’t really have convictions to begin with.) Congressional leaders refer to these legislators as “rebels.” And they are punished by not being appointed to plush committee assignments or by being overlooked for leadership positions. Plus, leadership will often target these rebel legislators for defeat in future primary elections in an attempt to replace him or her with a “team player” (meaning controlled toady for leadership).

Second, please understand that the fundamental goal of those elitists who control the neocons is GLOBALISM. For the most part, these people care absolutely nothing about domestic social issues. It doesn’t matter to them one whit whether a congressman is pro-life or pro-choice; whether he or she is “pro-family” or pro-gay marriage; whether he or she is identified as a conservative or a liberal. These issues don’t even enter the mind of a globalist. They have but one goal: GLOBALISM. Accordingly, everything they promote promotes globalism. EVERYTHING! Never forget that!

Therefore, “conservative” scorecards are little indication as to whether a congressman or senator is a neocon. A congressman or senator can easily have a “B” or “80%” or better conservative rating, and still be a totally-controlled neocon. Most of the issues on these “conservative” or “Christian” or “Family Values” scorecards do not even grade congressman on most neocon issues, so a high score on these rating systems means little. This helps explain why so many Christian voters have little discernment in the voting booth. Their entire reason for voting is skewed. Plus, don’t forget that many of the so-called Christian leaders who put together these scorecards are themselves controlled neocons.

So, just what is a neocon? Remember, the goal of globalists is GLOBALISM. Therefore, here are the issues that promote globalism. Here are the issues that form a common denominator among neocons. When you observe your professing “conservative” congressman or senator supporting these issues, you can KNOW that they are, in reality, globalist-controlled NEOCONS.

• Pro-International “Free Trade” Deals

From NAFTA to TPP, these so-called “free trade” deals are nothing more than international loopholes that discriminate against the manufacturing jobs and labor class of individual countries and favor the billionaire class that conducts business internationally.

America has lost (and continues to lose) millions of manufacturing jobs--and now even high tech jobs--due to these international “free trade” deals. There is nothing “free” about these “free trade” deals. Quotas are often established for American exports but not for foreign imports. Taxes, duties, tariffs, etc., almost always favor foreign imports and punish U.S. exports. As a result, U.S. businesses are forced to take their companies overseas to compete. Entire factories close down resulting in millions of displaced U.S. workers. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Following the implementation of NAFTA by Congress in 1994, our trade surpluses with partners Mexico and Canada quickly became trade deficits, soaring to nearly $200 billion. Over one million U.S. jobs were lost and illegal immigration doubled almost immediately. Beyond that, U.S. workers that were somehow able to maintain their jobs watched their wages shrink. That’s right, SHRINK.

In Mexico, NAFTA has wreaked indescribable havoc. Already depressed wages plummeted. The availability of goods did NOT increase; it substantially DECREASED. While, guess what? Prices INCREASED. It was the passage of NAFTA that started this entire morass the U.S. currently finds itself mired in regarding illegal immigration.

And now neocon Republicans have just collaborated with President Barack Obama to pass another giant “free trade” bill, called TPP (nicknamed Obamatrade). Many people have rightly called TPP “NAFTA on steroids.” Indeed it is. And, yes, Ben Carson enthusiastically endorses Obamatrade. Ted Cruz also voted for it.

Not only are neocons Boehner/Ryan/McConnell enthusiastically passing TPP, they are happily giving “fast track” authority to Obama. This allows Obama (or any President) to negotiate and sign a trade agreement without congressional approval--including language that may completely alter established U.S. laws. Subsequent trade legislation proposed to Congress by the President would not be subject to committee markups and Congress would have only 90 days to approve it--and floor amendments would not be allowed.

See the report: NAFTA At 20: One Million U.S. Jobs Lost, Higher Income Inequality

Support for these international “Free Trade” deals is a dead giveaway that a congressman or senator is indeed a neocon.

• Pro-Illegal Immigration

The great goal of globalists is to blur or even eliminate national borders. National borders, and the laws that protect them, are VERY burdensome to multinational traders. National borders restrict globalists in their pursuit of international wealth. They envision a global economy with a global government in place to protect that global economy. Individual nationhood is an obstacle to that goal.

The EU is the quintessential prototype of the globalists’ dream of global government. Until individual states within the United States stopped it (temporarily, no doubt), neocon Republican President G.W. Bush collaborated with Canada’s Paul Martin and Mexico’s Vicente Fox to establish an EU-type regional government in North America. It was called the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” or SPP. It was also called the “North American Community” and “North American Union.”

The goal of these so-called “partnerships” is to erase national borders and establish regional government over participating nations that exercise authority over the flow of goods and services between countries. As an example, the current TPP passed by the Republican House and Senate and signed by Obama has copious rules that further circumvent America’s current immigration laws. Plus, the invasion of illegal aliens from the Middle East into European countries is facilitated by the enactment of lax immigration policies established by the EU.

The SPP was the brainchild of what must be regarded as the top neocon think tank of all: the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). And, yes, one of the movers and shakers for this proposed EU-style regional government in North America was CFR member Heidi Cruz, wife of Senator and Presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

Thankfully, public pressure from the State legislatures in Texas and Oklahoma derailed SPP. (This is another example of how states can--and should--use their constitutional authority of interposition to thwart the overreach of federal and even international government.)

Another way illegal immigration helps globalists remove national boundaries is it serves to remove a country’s (any country’s) national culture and identity, thereby transforming it into a “sanctuary nation.” In the U.S., this includes removing our Christian heritage.

• Pro-war

NOTHING rings the cash register for globalists like war. War helps to replace recalcitrant national leaders who refuse to give international financiers carte blanche in their countries. War helps to redraw national boundaries that favor the global economy. War brings HUGE profit windfalls to the military-industrial complex that is mostly in bed with high-paying globalists. War causes citizens in free countries to accept more governmental authority (which ALWAYS includes an international component) over their affairs that would never be the case in peacetime. War is also the perfect solution to resolve the economic problems of a sinking financial system.

In this regard, religious bigotry and intolerance makes it EASY for globalists to manipulate the passions of people in favor of war. Pitting Christians against Muslims and Muslims against Christians--and putting Israel in the middle--is the current tactic favored by globalists. And, Boy! Is it ever successful! Muslim terrorists, the Israeli army, and the U.S. military are pawns in the hands of the globalist elite (yes, globalist facilitators can be found in London, Ankara, Tel Aviv, Riyadh, and Washington, D.C.) who are using the neocons in Washington, D.C., to manipulate war in the Middle East to further their greater goal of creating war between the United States and Russia.

Another World War would be a HUGE benefit to globalists. “Who would win a war between Russia and the United States?” you ask. GLOBALISTS, that’s who. And it seems clear to me that that is exactly what the neocons in D.C. are striving for.

President George W. Bush was the first U.S. President to be totally and thoroughly dominated by neocons. The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan had been planned in neocon war rooms for years, just waiting for the right provocation. And the continuing U.S. wars in the Middle East are every bit neocon inventions. Yes, folks, Barack Obama himself is but a puppet of the neocons. In truth, neocons are now thoroughly ensconced in our Justice Department, State Department, DOD, CIA, etc.

And at this early juncture, the only two 2016 presidential candidates who MIGHT NOT be puppets of the neocon war machine are Rand Paul and Donald Trump--and at this point, I’m not certain about Trump. But it is more than interesting that it is Paul and Trump that the GOP establishment seems determined to destroy. As one GOP adviser said recently, the Republican Party must “put a bullet in Trump.” Now you know why.

• Pro-Police State

Freedom is anathema to globalists; an armed citizenry is anathema to globalists. In order for globalism to succeed, people must be restrained. They must be surveilled. They must be regulated. They must be controlled.

The so-called War on Terror (and the federal War on Drugs before that) is the biggest ruse ever invented to put a Police State in place. False flag terror attacks, a plethora of seemingly “random” mass shootings, and a perpetual media barrage against the right of citizens to defend themselves are all tactics of globalists to reduce liberty--and increase government dependence--in a nation.

Neocons are the ones who are the loudest cheerleaders for war in the Middle East, increased surveillance of the American citizenry, the militarization of our local and State police agencies, and antagonistic policies against Russia.

Look at the congressional votes for The Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, NDAA (especially sections 1021 and 1022), NSA spying, etc. Look at the voting records regarding bills or amendments that would stop the federal government from supplying military armament to our local and State police agencies. You will find that the vast majority of our current presidential candidates, and perhaps even YOUR congressman and senators, voted to facilitate the burgeoning Police State in our country. Folks, these are neocons.

• Pro-Deficit Spending

Neocons support deficit spending. In this, they are far worse than overt liberals. For example, liberals in the Democrat Party want to tax-and-spend, while neocons in the Republican Party want to borrow-and-spend. Between the two, deficit spending is worse because it gives the federal government (and the globalists who influence and leech off them) unlimited spending--and thus unlimited profits. Beyond that, the inevitable result of unrestrained spending is WAR: globalists’ biggest cash cow of all. They win coming and going.

Notice how neocons John Boehner and Paul Ryan (with support from the vast majority of congressmen from both sides of the aisle) so quickly and easily raised the federal debt ceiling again--and for, not one, but TWO YEARS. This, in essence, gives Barack Obama his ninth year in office. Why would they do this? They are neocons, that’s why.

So, folks, forget party labels. Forget the left-right, liberal-conservative paradigm. These are the issues that neocons in Congress are using to drive national politics today--and these are the issues that are killing independence and freedom in the United States.

Folks, keep this list and use it to gauge your congressman and senators, as well as our presidential candidates. No matter what they call themselves, if they support these issues, they are NEOCONS.