Red Flag Laws
Are just one more divide and conquer tactic of pitting citizen against citizen.
Republican vs democrat
Rich vs Poor
Black vs White
Christian vs Muslim
Peaceful Firearm owners vs Gun Control zealots.
etc ..
Anyone that thinks these laws are good for society should think twice.
What do you think will happen when they come for the firearms, will the 120+ million owners just give up without a fight with 300+ million firearms.
History shows what happens next, genocide and democide and if you think for one moment all police and all military will follow orders to remove the firearms, you are sadly mistaking. This would be the next civil war, how many would die in this unconstitutional act, do you think anyone would be immune from the loss of life from this event, you, your loved ones, Civil war as all wars are a horrible thing. Time to Think.
Monday, January 21, 2019
Thursday, April 6, 2017
An Open Letter To Kelleigh Nelson At News With Views
An Open Letter To Kelleigh Nelson At News With Views
Published: Thursday, April 6, 2017
Kelleigh,
Thank you very much for making me look good. I know that was not your intention. Your intention was to discredit, disparage, denigrate, and destroy me. But you actually did just the opposite. So, thank you.
The title of your column, “News With Views Response To Pastor Chuck Baldwin’s Lies,” suggests you were not simply writing your own sentiments but were writing on behalf of Paul Walter and News With Views. So, I must assume that you are either paid staff or part of the management team. If so, I would think the honest thing to do would be to disclose this relationship.
In the very first sentence of your column, you said my articles were “anti-Semitic.” By calling my fact-based, well-researched columns regarding Zionism “anti-Semitic,” you told the world that you are unable to address this issue with reason and integrity, much less with scriptural knowledge and acumen. Name-calling, especially the hackneyed label of “anti-Semitic,” is what people do when they cannot discuss the issue with intelligence. And in the next sentence when you state, “Mr. Walter said they’d be happy to print any other articles, but they receive too many complaints and lose readers when Baldwin’s anti-Israel articles appear on the website, even when the editor includes a disclaimer,” you proved my assertion that Paul is pandering to readers and that the goal of News With Views (NWV) is NOT to “shatter illusion” with reality but to ingratiate its views to the tastes (and financial gifts) of readers--even if it means promoting illusion. That one sentence proves that the goal of NWV is not the proclamation of truth but catering the message to a particular donor base.
Let me ask you, Kelleigh, how many readers has NWV lost since people found out that Paul Walter is censoring me? But it really doesn’t matter how many readers have abandoned NWV over this blatant censorship of one of its longest-running columnists, does it? And why not? Because NWV is all about covering for and pandering to Zionists such as yourself.
Of course, in the title and body of your hit piece, you repeatedly called me a liar. Kelleigh, I’ve been writing columns for NWV for 15 years. Obviously, Paul Walter believed me to be a truth teller. He even asked me to give NWV an “exclusive first,” which meant I sent my weekly columns to NWV a day before sending it to any other publication, including MY OWN WEBSITE. And the scores and scores of people who have written NWV to tell them that they would no longer read NWV was because they know that I write the truth no matter what people think or whether people like what I write or not. I’ve never pandered to ANY audience; and I won’t start pandering now.
Frankly, Kelleigh, you were speaking about something of which you have absolutely NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE. Were you in on the phone call with Paul Walter and me? No! You have no firsthand knowledge whatsoever about who said what or when. And I think most people who read your pathetic attack piece saw that little reality right away.
I have been preaching, teaching, and writing truth for over 40 years. Why would I lie about this? What would I have to gain? NOTHING. The publisher of NWV told both me (on November 30, 2016 at 3:09 pm MST) and my personal assistant (on March 23, 2017 at 3:31 pm MDT) the story about losing a $1000 per month donation if he continued to publish my columns that were critical of Israel. My PA transcribed his comments as he said them to her. She is VERY efficient. This means he told the story TWICE to two different people in two different phone calls. And the publisher himself told me that this donor was Jewish. Think: How else could I even know this? I suppose it's possible that this publisher suffers from some sort of cognitive impairment and, therefore, truly cannot remember saying it; but that doesn’t change the fact that he did. Do you really think I could make something like this up? And, again, why would I? What would I have to gain?
When you think of it, a $1000 per month donation to an organization as large as NWV is not that much money. And the amount of money is totally irrelevant. To me, it has nothing to do with money. It takes a lot of money to operate a business like NWV. I’m sure everyone understands that. I couldn’t care less how much money NWV takes in. When good people are engaged in a good fight, I wish them nothing but the best. I hope they do well. I want them to succeed. The only point of bringing up the money aspect was that it serves to prove the power and influence Zionists have to control public debate. They use the power of their money to manipulate even good people. It seems clear to me that this is exactly what has happened at NWV.
But I refuse to allow my columns to be censored, so I withdrew my columns from NWV. And after all of those years writing for NWV, I had to let readers know WHY my columns would no longer appear on that site. I knew NWV would not tell readers the real reason. If people now want to believe that I have started lying, so be it.
I find this interesting: among the numerous websites that carry my column is RenewAmerica.com. This is Dr. Alan Keyes’ website. Dr. Keyes has been carrying my columns almost as long as NWV did--since 2005 (12 years). In 2008, Dr. Keyes and I were political opponents. We competed against each other in the presidential primary of the Constitution Party. I won that contest and went on to be the presidential nominee of the Party that year.
The key issue that distinguished the candidacies of Dr. Keyes and mine was foreign policy. I am a strong non-interventionist in the similitude of Ron Paul. And I suspect that Dr. Keyes and I differ on our positions regarding the State of Israel as well, since most of our wars are fought on behalf of Israel. Dr. Keyes has several pro-Zionist writers on his website. Nevertheless, Dr. Keyes has never once put a DISCLAIMER above my column or tried to censor me in any way. What should that tell you? It tells me that the reason Alan Keyes acts in such a gentlemanly and intellectually honest manner is because he doesn’t have people like you, Kelleigh, influencing him, and, therefore, he is open to honest debate from sincere people. And I’m confident that Dr. Keyes is doing quite well financially. That’s a lesson NWV needs to learn.
Here are my columns on RenewAmerica.com:
Chuck Baldwin's Columns On RenewAmerica.com
It is also more than interesting that the column you published on NWV repeatedly calling me a liar spends the bulk of the article bashing me for my theological position opposing Zionism--a theological position held by millions of Christians throughout the world, by the way. Writers for NWV commonly bash Islam with NO repercussions. But obviously NO ONE is allowed to tell the truth about Zionism or the faux State of Israel without being censored and then called a liar and every dirty name one can think of. But the Scripture is clear: “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist.” (I John 4:3) By definition, that includes Judaism. So, why does NWV condemn the antichrist spirit of Islam but condone the antichrist spirit of Judaism?
As for Kelleigh Nelson, who is she? What “Christian” and “conservative” would tout being a high school classmate of Hillary Rodham as you do in the brief bio under your columns? Your bio says you have been “researching the Christian right and their connections to the left, the new age, and cults since 1975.” Hmm. Does this mean you have a penchant for destroying the “Christian right”? Who else have you researched? Have you done any research into the Zionist connections to the occult, atheism, Talmudism, Kabbalism, the New World Order, and the attempted destruction of Christianity worldwide?
Kelleigh, I know what it feels like to be lied about. I know the pain it causes one’s family and friends. People have told the most vile and vicious lies imaginable about me. And they still do. I promise you I would NEVER intentionally lie about ANYONE. And I haven’t lied about Paul. Remember, Paul was using the loss of a monthly donation to explain why he was going to censor my columns that would be critical of Israel. From his perspective, it makes perfect sense. What other reason would he have to start censoring them?
Kelleigh, I realize you view Zionists favorably, but the truth is, Zionists control the New York media, most of Hollywood and the entertainment industries, and most U.S. congressmen and senators (and maybe President Trump). They destroy (at least try to) the careers and reputations of ANYONE who is seen as disloyal to Israel. If you don’t believe that, just talk to Mel Gibson and hundreds more. Are you now trying to do the same thing to me?
So tell me, Kelleigh, what’s the difference between NWV and the New York media? If writers are not free to intelligently, rationally, logically, and factually report the truth about Israel and if Christian writers are not allowed to present the scriptural case against Zionism and the faux State of Israel, how is NWV anything except another Zionist-controlled website? Are you and NWV afraid of an intelligent, historical, and Biblical debate on Zionism? It appears so.
NWV allowed a Zionist rabbi to attack my position on Israel, but refused to print Christian scholars who attempted to come to my defense. So, it is obvious that the censorship at NWV runs very deep. I know for a fact that there are several of the current writers at NWV who share my theological position on Israel. I know that the way Paul has censored me bothers them deeply. If all of them start writing columns that honestly reflect their heart convictions on this subject, Paul will need to start censoring a bunch of his writers.
Then, in your attempt at sounding pious and spiritual at the end of your attack, you refer to Jesus, “the Jewish Messiah, and King of the Jews.” Surely, it is not lost on you that the Jews rejected their Messiah. Surely, it is not lost on you that they crucified their Messiah and persecuted His disciples for the entire duration of the New Testament record. Surely, it is not lost on you that Lenin and Stalin were Zionists and that the Bolshevik Revolution was created and carried out mostly by Zionists. Surely, it is not lost on you that the so-called Jews in Palestine today could not trace their lineage to the Biblical Hebrews if their lives depended on it. And in fact, the vast majority of them share NO blood relationship with Biblical Hebrews--and even if they did, the Scripture clearly states, “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.” (I Corinthians 15:50) Surely, it is not lost on you that many of the people who are the most aggressive at expunging America’s Christian heritage are Zionists.
But what does seem to be lost on you is that:
“For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel.” (Romans 9:6)
“They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.” (Romans 9:8)
“As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.” (Romans 9:25)
“What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith. But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.” (Romans 9:30, 31)
“For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.” (Romans 10:12)
“What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.” (Romans 11:7)
“What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?” (Romans 3:1)
“That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.” (Galatians 3:14)
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Galatians 3:28, 29)
“For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.” (Galatians 4:25, 26)
“For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” (Romans 2:28, 29)
“Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.” (Galatians 3:16)
“And I [Jesus] know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” (Revelation 2:9)
“Behold, I [Jesus] will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie.” (Revelation 3:9)
Kelleigh, I have produced a two-DVD, eight-message series on “The Church And Israel.” I go into great depth to show the New Testament truth on this subject. Have you watched these messages? Have you read Michael Hoffman’s scholarly masterpiece “Judaism’s Strange God’s”? I’m sure you have no intention of reading or watching anything that might challenge your biased point of view.
But should you reconsider, you can find my “Church And Israel” series here:
The Church And Israel Combo
Please remember, Kelleigh, I once believed as you do about Israel (but never to the extreme that you do). But I have always been a truth seeker, and when God reveals truth to me, I follow it, even if it means I must repudiate falsehoods that I once believed were true. And after much prayer and thoughtful, painstaking study of the scriptures, God revealed to me that the modern State of Israel is a devilish counterfeit and has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biblical or prophetic Israel. And if fidelity to this truth costs me $1000 a month--or my entire livelihood for that matter--I still will NOT pander my speaking and writing to anyone (not even to disgruntled, self-absorbed, prideful people in a church pew--and FYI, Kelleigh, Liberty Fellowship has NEVER been stronger and sweeter than it is RIGHT NOW; just thought you’d like to know that). When the day comes that God would choose to no longer sustain my work, I will gladly leave it, because it is not my work at all; it is His.
But it does appear to me that "News With Views" should change its name to "News With Zionist-Approved Views."
And unless you force me to respond further, I have nothing more to say about it. Countless other websites and publications continue to carry my columns; and I will continue to speak the truth as I see it. And should any of them try to censor me, I will withdraw my columns from them as well. I have many thousands of faithful readers independent of any third-party website or publication.
Believe it or not, Kelleigh, there are still millions of people who haven’t sold their birthright of freedom for a mess of pottage--or for a $1000 per month donation. And millions more see the faux State of Israel for what it is. And thousands more are awakening to this truth all of the time. I guess that’s what has you worried. But censoring me will not stop this awakening, Kelleigh. It is an awakening of the Spirit. Who knows? If you made an objective study of the scriptures, the Holy Spirit might illuminate your heart and mind to the truth as well.
And, of course, I do concur with you that we should pray for each other. On that, we can definitely agree. Please give Paul my best regards, and tell him I appreciate the many years that we were able to work together.
© Chuck Baldwin
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form
I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:
Chuck Baldwin Live Store
To subscribe to my weekly columns, click here:
Subscribe to Chuck's Column
Thursday, December 8, 2016
Neocons Are The Swamp
Published: Thursday, December 8, 2016
By: Chuck Baldwin
Donald Trump won the White House on the promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington, D.C. He rode the wave of outsider all the way inside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But does Donald Trump even understand what the swamp is or who the people are that keep filling the swamp? By many of his presidential picks thus far (already summarized in this column), I am getting the impression that Trump may not understand who these swamp-fillers really are.
The swamp-fillers are NEOCONS. And they are the biggest threat to America and to everyone who lives on this planet regardless of nationality.
The word “neocon” has become a common term in our political lexicon. However, I don’t think most people truly understand its definition. And at this juncture, I am highly suspicious as to whether Donald Trump understands the definition.
Neocons can be Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal. Political ideologies and parties mean nothing when it comes to who is a neocon. Many neocons are conservative on domestic social issues. Many are liberal on domestic social issues. When it comes to identifying a neocon, titles are meaningless. Hillary Clinton is as much a neocon as Paul Ryan.
First, it is imperative that we understand how politicians in Washington, D.C., operate. Congressional leaders know which congressmen and senators are controllable--and most of them are. Only a handful of our federal congressmen and senators are “untouchable.” My guess is, less than one hundred out of the 535 House members and U.S. senators are truly NOT controlled--and that includes liberals and conservatives.
The vast majority of our congressmen and senators are either morally tainted, which makes them prime targets for bribery and manipulation (can anyone say former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert?), or they are egotistical, ambition-driven hedonists and sociopaths who will do virtually anything to advance themselves. This is the largest group, in my opinion.
Before any vote is cast in Congress, leaders take note of the political makeup of the districts and states that elected their representatives. Was he or she elected by a liberal or conservative district? What are the issues at home that the legislator campaigned on? All of this is readily known by congressional leaders.
Heads are counted before the actual vote to test whether a given bill will comfortably pass or not. If there is a comfortable margin of support for a bill, members who come from a district with opposing views can vote according to the way that will keep the constituents back home happy. ONLY if a bill’s passage requires that members vote against the will of their constituents will they be asked to do so. And the ones who are controlled WILL vote with their congressional leadership--regardless of how much it riles up the constituents back home. Of course, leadership has professionals that will coach the legislator as to how to explain the “bad” vote to the people back home. And, since most votes are not that close, these tactics are not usually required and the legislator’s voting record can appear “good” to the folks back home.
Again, there is only a small handful of congressmen and senators that are untouchable and will NOT cave in to their political leadership when the pressure is on. Congressional leaders refer to these legislators as “rebels.” And they are punished by not being given plush committee assignments or by being overlooked for leadership positions. Plus, leadership will often target the rebel legislators of their own party for defeat in future primary elections in an attempt to replace him or her with a “team player”--meaning a controlled toady for leadership.
Secondly, please understand that the fundamental goal of the elitists who control the neocons is globalism. For the most part, these people care absolutely nothing about domestic social issues. It doesn’t matter to them one whit whether a congressman is pro-life or pro-choice; whether he or she is “pro-family” or pro-gay marriage; whether he or she is identified as a conservative or a liberal. These issues don’t even enter the mind of a globalist. They have but one goal: globalism. Therefore, everything they promote promotes globalism. Everything! Never forget that.
Therefore, “conservative” scorecards are little indication as to whether a congressman or senator is a neocon. A congressman or senator can easily have a “B” or “80%” or better conservative rating and still be a controlled neocon. Most of the issues on these “conservative” or “Christian” or “Family Values” scorecards do not even grade congressman on most neocon issues, so a high score in these rating systems means little. This helps explain why so many Christian voters have little discernment in the voting booth. Their entire reason for voting is skewed. Plus, don’t forget that many of the so-called Christian leaders who put together these scorecards are themselves controlled neocons.
So, just what is a neocon? Remember again that neocons are controlled by globalists. Therefore, the goal is globalism. Here are six of the core issues that promote globalism. Here are the issues that form a common denominator among neocons. When you observe your professing “conservative” congressman or senator supporting these issues, you can KNOW that they are, in reality, globalist-controlled neocons.
*International “Free Trade” Deals
From GATT to NAFTA to TPP, these so-called free trade deals are nothing more than international loopholes that discriminate against the manufacturing jobs and labor class of individual countries in favor of the billionaire class that conducts business internationally.
America has lost millions of manufacturing jobs--and now even high tech jobs--due to these international “free trade” deals. There is nothing “free” about “free trade” deals. Quotas are often established for American exports but NOT for foreign imports. Taxes, duties, tariffs, etc., almost always favor foreign imports and punish U.S. exports. U.S. businesses are forced to take their companies overseas to compete. Entire factories close down, resulting in millions of misplaced U.S. workers. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Following the implementation of NAFTA by Congress, our trade surpluses with partners Mexico and Canada quickly became trade deficits, soaring to nearly $200 billion. Over one million U.S. jobs were lost, and illegal immigration doubled almost immediately. Beyond that, U.S. workers who were somehow able to maintain their jobs watched their wages shrink. That’s right, shrink.
In Mexico, NAFTA has wreaked indescribable havoc. Already depressed wages plummeted. The availability of goods did NOT increase; it substantially DECREASED. While, guess what? Prices INCREASED. It was the passage of NAFTA in 1994 that started the avalanche of illegal immigration into the U.S. from Mexico.
We watched neocon Republicans collaborating with globalist Democrat President Barack Obama to pass the preliminary version of another giant “free trade” bill, called Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP--nicknamed Obamatrade). Many people have rightly called TPP “NAFTA on steroids.”
Not only did neocons Boehner/Ryan/McConnell enthusiastically promote TPP, they happily supported giving “fast track” authority to Obama. This allows Obama (or any President) to negotiate and sign a trade agreement without congressional approval--including language that may completely alter established U.S. laws. Subsequent trade legislation proposed to Congress by the President would not be subject to committee markups, and Congress would have only 90 days to approve it--and floor amendments would not be allowed.
See the report:
NAFTA At 20: One Million U.S. Jobs Lost, Higher Income Inequality
Candidate Trump said he would kill NAFTA and TPP. But since winning the election, he is already back-pedaling on NAFTA and saying he’s not going to kill it, just “fix” it. This is not a good sign. It would mean that this major plank of the neocon agenda may be left intact under Trump’s presidency. I optimistically expect Trump to NOT sign the full implementation of TPP, but now I highly doubt he will honor his word to overturn NAFTA. This might be because congressional neocons within the GOP have told Trump they will NOT overturn NAFTA and he is not willing to fight them over it. Watch this closely.
*Illegal Immigration
The great goal of globalists is to blur or even eliminate national borders. National borders, and the laws that protect them, are very burdensome to multinational traders. National borders restrict globalists in their pursuit of international wealth. Globalists envision a global economy--with a global government and global military in place to protect that global economy. Individual nationhood is an obstacle to that goal.
The EU is the quintessential prototype of the globalists’ dream of global government. Until individual states within the United States stopped it, neocon Republican President G.W. Bush collaborated with Canada’s Paul Martin and Mexico’s Vincente Fox to establish an EU-type regional government in North America. It was called the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). It was also called the “North American Community” and “North American Union.”
The goal of these so-called partnerships is to erase national borders and establish regional government over participating nations that exercise authority over the flow of goods and services--and immigrants--between countries. As an example, the current TPP passed by the Republican House and Senate and signed by Obama has copious rules that further circumvent America’s current immigration laws. Plus, the current invasion of illegal aliens from the Middle East into European countries is facilitated by the enactment of lax immigration policies established by the EU.
The SPP was the brainchild of what must be regarded as the top neocon think tank of all: the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Thankfully, public pressure from U.S. Border States (especially Texas and Oklahoma) derailed SPP.
Another way illegal immigration helps globalists remove national boundaries is, it serves to remove a country’s (any country’s) national culture and identity, thereby transforming it into a “sanctuary nation.” In the U.S., this includes removing our Christian heritage.
Anti-illegal immigration was Donald Trump’s number one campaign theme. We will see how much of his rhetoric on this issue will translate into meaningful action. One thing is for sure, the neocons in D.C.--including some of those that Trump has placed in his presidential administration--will NOT passively sit back and let him put a stop to illegal immigration without doing everything they can to ensure that the borders remain wide open. Watch it: the fight to maintain illegal immigration is going to come from within Trump’s very own administration. His resolve on this issue will be sorely tested.
*Perpetual War
Nothing rings the cash register for globalists like war. War helps to replace recalcitrant national leaders who refuse to give international financiers carte blanche in their countries. War helps to redraw national boundaries that favor the global economy. War brings HUGE profit windfalls to the military-industrial-surveillance complexes that are mostly in bed with high-paying globalists. War causes citizens in free countries to accept more governmental authority (which always includes an international component) over their affairs that would never be the case in peacetime. And war is also the perfect solution to resolve the economic problems of a sinking financial system.
In this regard, religious bigotry and intolerance make it easy for globalists to manipulate the passions of people in favor of war. Pitting Christians against Muslims and Muslims against Christians is the current tactic favored by globalists. And, boy, is it working!
When GW Bush was President, the boogeyman was Iraq and Afghanistan. Under Obama, the boogeyman was Syria. And with Donald Trump’s picks for National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, Secretary of Defense, James Mattis, and Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, John Kelly, it appears the new boogeyman will be Iran. This is all a manipulation of the globalists to keep the flames of war lit in the world’s only superpower: the United States of America.
Peace is the last thing globalists want. War profiteers lose trillions of dollars annually without the war machine generating limitless wealth for the global elite. Therefore, globalists rely on their war hawk toadies like GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Henry Kissinger, the CFR, et al. to keep the war fires HOT. We will soon see whether Trump truly understands this part of the “swamp.” On Tuesday of this week, Trump hosted ultra-globalist Henry Kissinger at Trump Tower. That should send chills up your spine. The sovereignty and independence of the United States (not to mention global peace) has no greater enemy than Henry Kissinger. Does Trump have any idea who he is dealing with? We’ll see.
Just this week in Fayetteville, North Carolina, President-Elect Trump said, “The United States is going to abandon its decades of policies promoting regime change in countries around the world.” He also pledged to “follow a policy of restraining U.S. military force around the world rather than unleashing it.” This policy, if implemented, would be a blatant attack against the globalist-neocon perpetual war doctrine. I doubt that generals Mattis, Flynn, and Kelly will be fans of such a dramatic reversal of this long-entrenched perpetual war doctrine; and for Trump to fulfill this pledge, he will be forced to deal head on with the warmongering neocons from all over Washington, D.C. I hope he is serious about this pledge. Again, we’ll see.
*International Banking
Someone said, “All wars are bankers’ wars.” I don’t believe that is strictly true, but I will say MOST wars are bankers wars. And people can start name calling all they want, but it is a cold, hard fact that Zionists are the head of the snake when it comes to international banking. For example, the U.S. Federal Reserve is controlled by the Zionist banks of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Rothschild, Warburg, Lehman Brothers, Lazard Brothers, Israel Moses Seif, and Kuhn Loeb. In fact, the Zionist global banking system controls most of the financial institutions of countries throughout the world.
It is a no-brainer that international banking and global war go hand-in-hand. This is why you will notice that neocon war hawks in Congress are also heavily financed by Zionists. For this and other reasons, I am deeply concerned that Donald Trump’s Zionist son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has been appointed as Trump’s personal adviser and is right now setting up shop in Washington, D.C. If Donald Trump does not truly comprehend the role that Zionism plays in the global war agenda of the neocons, he will NEVER be able to successfully “drain the swamp.”
*Police State
Freedom is anathema to globalists; an armed citizenry is anathema to globalists. In order for globalism to succeed, people must be restrained; they must be surveilled; they must be regulated; they must be controlled.
The so-called war on terror (including the federal “war on drugs”--especially marijuana) is the biggest ruse ever invented to put a Police State in place. False flag terror attacks, a plethora of seemingly “random” mass shootings, and a perpetual media barrage against the right of citizens to defend themselves are all tactics of globalists to reduce liberty--and increase government dependence--in a nation.
Neocons are the ones who are the loudest cheerleaders for war in the Middle East, increased surveillance of the American citizenry, the militarization of our local and State police agencies, and antagonistic policies against Russia.
To see if your congressman or senator is a neocon (or controlled by neocons), look at his or her votes for The Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the NDAA (sections 1021 and 1022), NSA spying, etc. Also look at their voting records regarding bills or amendments that would stop the federal government from supplying military armament to our local and State police agencies. You might be surprised to learn that YOUR congressman and senators voted to facilitate the burgeoning Police State in our country. Folks, these are either neocons or people that are controlled by neocons. Again, remember: being a conservative or liberal is completely irrelevant here.
This issue has always been my biggest concern about Donald Trump. Many of his statements regarding “stop and frisk” and other such notions are repugnant to anyone who believes in constitutional government and individual liberty. And several of the people Trump has chosen for his cabinet--including Senator Jeff Sessions and Congressman Mike Pompeo--have track records that greatly infringe on liberties protected in the Fourth Amendment of our Bill of Rights.
See my analysis of Trump’s early cabinet picks here:
Did Jeb Bush Win The Election?
Historically, I have found THE FREEDOM INDEX of the New American Magazine to be the best resource that monitors how congressmen and senators vote in or out of accordance with the U.S. Constitution.
See THE FREEDOM INDEX here:
The Freedom Index
*Unlimited And Unconstitutional Government Spending
Neocons support government spending--HUGE government spending. And the vast majority of federal spending in Washington, D.C., is completely unconstitutional. On the campaign trail, Donald Trump talked about getting rid of unconstitutional (I’m not sure he used that word) federal departments, such as the Department of Education. Of course, he has already appointed a new Secretary of Education, so he obviously no longer has any plans to dismantle this bloated and beastly bureaucracy. But the truth is, the Department of Education is just one of hundreds of unconstitutional alphabet agencies littering Washington, D.C., and sucking the wealth and productivity out of America--including the blatantly unconstitutional Department of Homeland Security (over which Trump appointed General John Kelly to head), the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation (Trump picked a CFR member to lead this unconstitutional agency), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (another unconstitutional agency that Trump has selected Dr. Ben Carson to lead), the diabolical Bureau of Land Management, the Naziesque Environmental Protection Agency (which Trump has appointed Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head), ad infinitum.
A quick note on General John Kelly and AG Scott Pruitt: Kelly is another one of those military generals with a bad case of Islamophobia. Trump now has three such generals in his cabinet. This only augments the concern I raised earlier in the column about Iran becoming the next boogeyman that the globalists will use to keep America at war. Plus, military men are not trained as policemen. Policemen operate under the authority of the Constitution, which protects the rights and liberties of American citizens. Soldiers operate under an entirely different set of protocols. Constitutional rights of individuals do NOT apply to a soldier’s Modus Operandi. Having a military general overseeing the largest domestic law enforcement agency (albeit an unconstitutional one) in the country should be disconcerting to every believer in our Bill of Rights.
Oklahoma AG Scott Pruitt seems to be a good choice to lead the EPA. He is a strong critic of this agency, which means he might be a good one to rein in this out-of-control federal leviathan.
Do you remember how neocons John Boehner and Paul Ryan (with support from the vast majority of congressmen from both sides of the aisle) so quickly and easily raised the federal debt ceiling last time? But when they raised the debt ceiling, it was for not one but TWO YEARS. This, in essence, gave Barack Obama his ninth budget year in office. Why would they do this? They are neocons.
So, folks, forget party labels. Forget the left-right, liberal-conservative paradigm. Forget campaign rhetoric. These are the issues that neocons in Washington, D.C., are using to drive national politics and foreign policy--and these are the issues that are killing independence and freedom in the United States. Keep this list and use it to gauge your congressman and senators, as well as Donald Trump’s presidency. No matter what they call themselves or the rhetoric they use, if they facilitate these issues, they are either neocons or they are controlled by neocons.
Is Donald Trump truly outside the control of the globalists and neocons? And does he truly know what the “swamp” is and how to drain it? These are the issues that will tell us.
P.S. This is the FINAL CALL FOR THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. These are the great historic documents that birthed and built the greatest free nation on earth. We compiled these documents in ONE VOLUME. These documents cannot be found in one volume anywhere else that I know of. In all likelihood, if young people do not get a copy of THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS, they will grow into adulthood never having read these great documents of our nation’s history, because most schools of all types are not teaching them.
Time is of the essence before our supply is exhausted. To order THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS, go here:
THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS
© Chuck Baldwin
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form
I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:
Chuck Baldwin Live Store
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Just to clear some things up on what I do and don't Support
Just to clear some things up on what I do and don't Support.
I support God through Yahweh, Jesus Christ First Above All Things.
I support the Bible as the Only Word of GOD, and No Other.
I Support America and it's Sovereignty First Above all other Country's including and especially the State of Israel.
I believe the new state of Israel declared in 1948 from the U.N. is Not of GOD and the Bible and is in fact an Apostate State and that is following the Talmud and a Zionist agenda that is not of God and is not good for the US-A or the World over, they only claim to dominate in the Middle East and we are fighting their Wars by Proxy. God Destroyed the State of Israel in 70 AD as was Prophesied in the Bible. It also Hinders us from sharing the True Word of God to the Jewish people, Jesus.
I support the Constitution and the Bill of Rights of the United States of American as the Law of the land and should be followed by all including the President and Congress of these Great United States, Democrat or Republican.
I do Not support the two party system, as it is more like a single party system in my view. I am not blue or red team I am on America First Team.
I do Not Support the U.N. or any other Globalist New World BS.
I will Support Trump, but the second He is outside the Constitution I will be one of the First to speak out.
I Do Not Support the never ending Wars in the Middle East.
My Spiritual Teaching comes from Pastor Dr. Chuck Baldwin and Liberty Fellowship Kalispell, MT. (He is also A Great History Teacher)
I Believe there are only two Great States Men in this Country that could Govern, that being Dr. Ron Paul and Pastor Dr. Chuck Baldwin.
This is what my Postings are all about.
Friday, November 18, 2016
World Suffers From Trump Shell Shock - Here’s What Will Happen Next
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Brandon Smith
I’ve been saying this for a long time, and I’ll say it again here — in life there are only two kinds of people: those who know and those who don’t. Some might claim there is a third option: those who don’t want to know. In any case, if you want to be able to foresee geopolitical and social trends, you have to be one of the people who know.
Above all else, in order to know you must be willing to step outside of the confusion and theater of the circus and look at developments from above. If you are biased and retain too many sacred cows you will never understand how the world works. You will be too busy trying to reinforce your own fantasies to see anything else.
Beyond this, you must also understand that political and social developments are not random; they are either reactions to deliberate policies of special interests or they are driven by policies of special interests. Therefore, these developments are predictable and can be calculated (to a point).
I usually refer to these “special interests” as global elites, or globalists, because that is how they often refer to themselves. The point is, most of the events you see in the political world are engineered events designed to elicit a specific psychological response from you and the people around you. You are not a human being to these people; you are either an asset to be molded or an obstacle to be disposed of. This is how our world works. Period. And until we fully understand this and accept it, things will never change.
So, to be clear, if you understand the minds of globalists and understand what they want, you can understand the basic direction of the future.
It is this philosophy which has allowed me to consistently and accurately predict geopolitical and economic events that very few other people have been able to predict. For example, I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that Barack Obama would veto it and that congress would override his veto, I predicted that Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican candidate for president of the U.S. and, for the past five months, I have been predicting that Donald Trump would win the 2016 election.
People can either attribute these series of successful predictions to pure “luck,” or they can consider the possibility that I know what I am talking about. I’ll leave that to them.
The real issue, though, is not that my predictions were correct. What is more important is WHY they were correct. To begin with, I am often correct because it is a fact that globalists influence events. Globalists are human (at least partially); thus, they are predictable, making events predictable. If you can see from the perspective of a globalist, you will know what they want and what they are likely to do to get it.
In a world without globalists I would have a hard time successfully predicting anything.
I never make a cold prediction without a concrete rationale for why I hold that view. I always break down the reasons and evidence that bring sense to them. Some analysts might be content to simply flip a coin and make a call without explanation; I am not.
As far as the Trump election win is concerned, this is what I said in June of this year:
“In light of the Brexit I’m going to have to call it here and now and predict that the most likely scenario for elections will be a Trump presidency. Trump has consistently warned of a recession during his campaign and with the Brexit dragging markets lower over the next few months, he will probably be proven “prophetic.”
… Even if Trump is a legitimate anti-establishment conservative, his entry into the Oval Office will seal the deal on the economic collapse, and will serve the globalists well. The international banks need only pull the plug on any remaining life support to the existing market system and allow it to fully implode, all while blaming Trump and his conservative supporters.
The mainstream media has been consistently comparing Trump supporters to Brexit supporters, and Trump himself has hitched his political wagon to the Brexit. This fits perfectly with the globalist narrative that populists and conservatives are killing the global economy and placing everyone at risk.”
All of my predictions are rooted in a particular premise; that the global elites have been, since 2008 at least, deliberately setting the stage for an evolving international financial crisis greater than any other seen in modern history. This crisis is a means to an end. Globalists use one strategy above all others to achieve their goals — the Hegelian Dialectic; problem, reaction, solution.
As I have documented for years, the elites openly call for the ultimate eradication of national sovereignty and the formation of a single world economy, a single world currency and, eventually, a single world government. In order to make this omelet, they intend to break a few eggs (and collapse a few economies). By blaming "national sovereignty" (and the people that defend it) for this crisis, they hope to convince the masses that the only practical solution is total centralization. You can read my in-depth analysis and evidence of this in my article “The Economic End Game Explained.”
I also specifically predicted the Brexit and the Trump win based on another premise; that the elites are allowing conservative movements to take political power in certain regions, only to remove stimulus support from the global economy afterward. That is to say, I successfully predicted the Brexit and the Trump win because I understand and accept the reality that conservatives and liberty activists are not “winning;” we are being set up as scapegoats for a financial crash that the globalists already created.
Again, people can either say I am lucky, or that there is something to my position, but the fact of the matter is I have been right and I will probably continue to be right. This brings us to what will happen going into 2017.
The election of Donald Trump signals a sea change in not only global politics, but more importantly, global economic stability and social developments. As frenetic and insane as 2016 has been, 2017 will be drastically more chaotic. Some of these changes will be obvious, some of them will once again only be visible to a handful of people in the world. Lets start first with my happier predictions…
The Death Of The Mainstream Media
This is an easy one. The mainstream media, with its insane regressive-progressives and elitist bias, misrepresented the “Alt-Right,” the Trump campaign and anti-social justice movements during the entirety of the election process. Not only this, but through Wikileaks the leftist media was made naked as numerous journalists and outlets were exposed; colluding directly with the DNC and the Hillary campaign to first bushwhack Bernie Sanders and then rig debates and polling numbers to show Clinton in a farcically superior position to Trump.
The mainstream media is now seen by the majority of Americans on the left and right as a lumbering rotting propaganda corpse that needs to be decapitated before it spreads its disease to anyone else. I predict MSM outlet readership and viewership (with the exception of FOX News) will collapse even further than it already has and that many outlets will be forced to consolidate until they fade out of existence.
As I have said for years, the mainstream media is dead, they just don’t know it yet. Well, after this election, everyone knows. The alternative media will take the place of the mainstream media. We will be adopting their viewership and growing explosively over the next year while they shrivel.
They decided that their job was not to report the facts, but to manipulate public opinion. They are liars and a disgrace to true journalism. Good riddance.
That said, some people will argue that my position that the elites wanted a Trump presidency is not tenable exactly because the liberal media worked so hard to rig public opinion against Trump. I will explain in my next article why these people are missing the bigger picture.
The Crippling Of Social Justice Warriors
The SJW cult is not dead, but it has been crippled. It is now a drooling bedridden quadriplegic eating its meals through a straw; a malfunctioning shell of a movement destined to be put out of its misery.
When I think of social justice warriors I think of the Island of Misfit Toys; nobody wants these people. They are a detriment to everything they touch, including the Democratic party. It was the zealotry of SJWs that caused conservatives to rally in anger around Trump. It was they that awakened the sleeping giant.
One reason I was so certain Clinton had set herself up for a loss was her insistence that the Democrats openly adopt these hell spawn and their ideology. By embracing politically correct rhetoric and accusing all opposition of being “deplorable” racists, sexists and homophobes, Clinton doomed her campaign from the very beginning. Anyone with any sense could see the massive tide against SJWs growing on the internet. In fact, I propose that the globalists, using the advanced web analytics at their disposal, saw it even before the rest of us did.
SJWs are a tiny minority in American society. Their only strategy has been to use Alinsky tactics to make their movement appear much larger than it really is. Through mutual aid and elitist supporters in popular media, SJWs presented a fabricated consensus. They made it seem as though they were the majority view and, thus, the "superior" view.
One fantastic result of the 2016 election has been the realization by conservatives that they are not isolated on the fringes of society. In fact, in America at least, we are a considerable force to be reckoned with. There is an old story of a Roman Senator 2,000 years ago who suggested the idea of forcing slaves to wear armbands to make them easily identifiable. Another senator admonished the notion, stating “No, if they realize how many of them there really are, they may revolt.”
This is what Election 2016 did for conservatives — we have seen that millions of us have arm bands, and we are now in revolt.
I rarely comment on race issues because I don’t really see race as very relevant in most cases; but it has been the tactic of social justice cultists to constantly and brutally target straight white males as the monsters of history and therefore responsible for the ills and failures of every minority group from today to eternity. At this point I think it is safe to say that we will NO LONGER sit idly by as whipping boys for sad, deluded people clamoring for victim group status.
The End Of Mainstream Polling
I was also confident in my prediction of a Trump win based on my knowledge of inconsistencies in modern polling methods. The fact of the matter is, polling suffers from the same lack of objectivity that any other “science” can at times suffer from — the results will always be vulnerable to influence from the observer. If the observer wants a particular outcome for the numbers, they will consciously or unconsciously rig their method to produce the desired result.
I saw this happen time and time again during the Brexit polls leading up to the referendum, and, as I stated many times before the U.S. election, the campaign polls seemed to be behaving the same way. This is how you get media sources like Reuters claiming a 90 percent chance of a win by Hillary Clinton just before the election. When pollsters weight their polls with far more democrats than republicans and when they poll the same groups repeatedly they are not going to get varied or honest data.
In the end, polls become propaganda tools rather than litmus tests. The mainstream has tried desperately to explain why their polls were so utterly wrong, but it is too late for them. After the Brexit and the U.S. election, no one is going to trust these numbers again.
Liberty Groups Will Get Some Breathing Room (For A Little While)
The steady drum beat of government antagonism for “patriot groups” is probably going to subside for a short time. I happen to know that many militia groups and preparedness networks are breathing a heavy sigh of relief today after eight years of a hostile Obama presidency, the IRS sniping at liberty organizations and individual activists based purely on political zealotry, the DHS profiling liberty activists as terrorists and the SPLC frothing at the mouth like rabid animals looking to use their ties to the feds as a means to sink their teeth into any conservatives with the guts to refuse participation in the mainstream narrative.
With conservatives launching into 2017 with complete control of government and a Trump mandate, it would seem that liberty groups have “won the fight” and have nothing to worry about.
That said, don’t get too comfortable, folks, because now we are going to discuss my negative predictions going into next year…
The Final Stage Of Economic Collapse
Economic collapse is a process, not a singular event; stock markets play only a minor part in this process. Most Americans’ only relation to the economy is through the daily rise and fall of the Dow Jones. If they see the Dow in the green, they go on with their day. If they see the Dow in the red, they stop and question what is happening. The election of Donald Trump has surprised many with a sudden rise, rather than fall, in stock markets. But, as I told my readers before the election, it would be wise to wait a couple of weeks before trying to analyze these markets because that is how long it will take just to absorb the election results.
I predict first that central banks around the globe will further cut stimulus measures and that the Fed is now guaranteed to raise interest rates, probably in December before Trump even enters the White House. I also believe that the process of initiating a market crisis will take approximately six months to become widely visible to the public. As a consequence of the Fed pulling the plug on markets, I predict Trump and the Fed will enter into open hostilities against each other, which will erode international faith in the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency.
By extension, Trump’s presence in the White House will exacerbate already-existing tensions with Saudi Arabia. The Saudi 9/11 bill is just the beginning. As a result, I believe Saudi Arabia will dump the U.S. dollar as the petro-currency, influencing numerous other OPEC nations to do the same. I believe this will happen by early 2018.
In my view, for now, oil prices will be the best indicator for where stocks are headed in the next few months.
This is not something many Trump supporters want to hear. The response in the liberty movement to my prediction that the elites would allow Trump into office was rather predictable as well. In my article 'Why The U.S. Election Has The Entire World Confused' I stated:
“I have not taken this position just to be contrary. If I think about it honestly, my position is truly a losing position. If I am mistaken and Clinton wins on the 8th then I’ll probably never hear the end of it, but that’s a risk that has to be taken, because what I see here is a move on the chess board that others are not considering. If I’m wrong, then I’m wrong.
That said, if I am right, then I still lose, because Trump supporters and half the liberty movement will be so enraptured that they will probably ignore the greater issue — that Trump is the candidate the elites wanted all along.”
This seems to be the reaction from about half the liberty movement so far; a general blind faith and bias, clinging to the idea that the election (just like the Brexit) was a victory, and that conservatives had just won the culture war and defeated the globalists. It’s funny how it wasn’t much of a controversy when everyone thought I was wrong about Trump winning in the first place.
There are two primary arguments that come up with these people. First, that my view on the influence of the elites is “unrealistic” and that the elites would have to be “omnipotent” in order to succeed in directing the outcome of these events so effectively. I will address this argument in detail in my next article on the Trump presidency and what the consequences will be for us all if Trump turns out not to be a constitutionalist.
The second argument they present is that the elites “will never succeed” in blaming Trump and conservatives for an economic crisis that was decades in the making. To the people that embrace this argument I say — I understand mass psychology far better than you do.
The reality is, half of America is ALREADY primed to blame Trump for everything that happens over the next four years (if we even make it that long). Possession is nine-tenths of the law in the minds of many. Beyond that, every meme in the global media and on the left is promoting the idea that Trump is an apocalypse in the making. Even Germany’s 'Der Spiegal' published its after-election magazine with a cover depicting Trump’s head as a giant comet hurtling towards the Earth. Don’t tell me that Trump cannot be blamed for an economic crisis. Only a complete idiot would suggest that he is anything other than the perfect scapegoat.
At bottom, it does not matter whether people believe the above predictions or not. I have hundreds of emails from readers who called me a “tinfoil hatter” in the past and are now apologizing. So, if you plan to react in a knee-jerk fashion to the notion that Trump and conservatives are being set up by the elites for a final financial flagellation, be sure to write two letters — one for today saying I’ve lost touch, and the other for tomorrow when you find out I was right once again.
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Trust but Verify
Now that Donald Trump has won the presidential election, most of the people who voted for him (along with most of the rest of the world) are breathing a huge sigh of relief. As I wrote earlier, a Hillary Clinton presidency was not only a threat to whatever liberties the American people have left, it was a threat to the peace and stability of the entire planet. Except for the radical protesters (most of whom did not even vote in the election and many of them who were paid to riot) who are making royal jackasses out of themselves in Portland, Oregon, and California, the perverts in Hollywood, and the presstitutes in the mainstream media, most of the nation (and the world with maybe the exception of China and Saudi Arabia) is feeling REAL GOOD about the election.
However, I want to caution Trump supporters that the last thing they can afford to do right now is do what conservatives normally do after a Republican wins the White House: go into a deep state of complacency. With the exception of stopping another Clinton from obtaining the White House (Hooray!), a Trump election accomplishes nothing. It is not the candidate, Donald Trump, that is going to govern from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. It is the president, Donald Trump, that will govern. And what kind of president Trump will make is yet to be seen.
I well remember when George W. Bush was elected President. The entire conservative, Christian, and Republican worlds fell into a state of extended hibernation. And G.W. Bush went on to trample more of our constitutional liberties than Bill Clinton and Barack Obama combined. This could only happen because he faced no resistance from the Republican Party or Christians and conservatives in general. They were sound asleep.
If the people who supported Donald Trump go to sleep now, there will be no going back. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to change the course of a nation. Frankly, if this opportunity is squandered, there likely will not be another one in most of our lifetimes.
After my post-election column last week, a lady wrote me and said, “I have confidence he [Trump] plans to do what is best for the country.” With all due respect, I don’t! I agree wholeheartedly with Thomas Jefferson. He said, “In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
If Donald Trump is going to be anything more than just another say-anything-to-get-elected phony, he is going to have to put raw elbow grease to his rhetoric. His talk got him elected, but it is going to be his walk that is going to prove his worth.
And, as I wrote last week, the biggest indicator as to whether or not he is truly going to follow through with his rhetoric is who he selects for his cabinet and top level government positions. So far, he has picked Reince Priebus as White House Chief of Staff and Stephen Bannon as White House Chief Strategist.
Reince Priebus is an establishment insider. He did NOTHING to help Trump get elected until toward the very end of the campaign. He is the former chairman of the Republican National Committee. If that doesn’t tell you what he is, nothing will. Trump probably picked him because he is in so tight with House Speaker Paul Ryan (a globalist neocon of the highest order) and the GOP establishment, thinking Priebus will help him get his agenda through the GOP Congress. But ideologically, Priebus does NOT share Trump’s anti-establishment agenda. So, this appointment is a risk at best and a sell-out at worst.
On the other hand, Stephen Bannon is probably a very good pick. He headed Breitbartnews.com, which is one of the premier “alt-right” media outlets that has consistently led the charge against the globalist, anti-freedom agenda of the political establishment in Washington, D.C. Albeit, Bannon is probably blind to the danger of Zionism and is, therefore, probably naïve about the New World Order. I don’t believe anyone can truly understand the New World Order without being aware of the role that Zionism plays in it.
To be honest, the possible appointments of Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, John Bolton and especially New Gingrich are MORE than troubling. Rudy Giuliani is “Mr. Police State,” and if he is selected as the new attorney general, the burgeoning Police State in this country will go into hyper-drive. NSA whistleblower Eric Snowden is already warning us about this. Chris Christie is a typical New England liberal Republican. His appointment to any position bodes NOTHING good. And John Bolton is a Bush pro-war neocon. But Newt Gingrich is the quintessential insider, globalist, and establishment hack.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the globalist elite gave Newt Gingrich the assignment of cozying up to (and “supporting”) Trump during his campaign with the sole intention of being in a position for Trump to think he owes Gingrich something so as to appoint him to a key cabinet post in the event that he won. Gingrich could then weave his evil magic during a Donald Trump presidential administration.
Newt Gingrich is a HIGH LEVEL globalist. He is the consummate neocon. And he has a brilliant mind (NO morals, but a brilliant mind--a deadly combination, for sure). If Donald Trump does not see through this man, and if he appoints him as a cabinet head in his administration, I will be forced to believe that Donald Trump is clueless about “draining the swamp.” You cannot drain the swamp by putting the very people who filled the swamp back in charge. And that’s exactly what Trump would be doing if he appoints Gingrich to any high-level position in his administration.
Trump is already softening his position on illegal immigration, on dismantling the EPA, on repealing Obamacare, on investigating and prosecuting Hillary Clinton, etc. Granted, he hasn’t even been sworn in yet and it’s still way too early to make a true judgment of his presidency. But for a fact, his cabinet appointments and his first one hundred days in office will tell us most of what we need to know.
What we need to know right now is that WE CANNOT GO TO SLEEP. We cannot sit back in lethargy and complacency and just assume that Donald Trump is going to do what he said he would do. If we do that, we might as well have elected Hillary Clinton, because at least then we would be forever on guard against her forthcoming assaults against our liberties.
There is a reason we have lost more liberties under Republican administrations than Democratic ones over the past few decades. And that reason is the conservative, constitutionalist, Christian, pro-freedom people who should be resisting government’s assaults against our liberties are sound asleep because they trust a Republican President to do the right thing--and they give the GOP a pass as our liberties are expunged piece by piece. A pass they would NEVER give to a Democrat.
The difference in this election is that Donald Trump didn’t run against the Democrats; he ran against the entire Washington establishment, including the Republican establishment. Hopefully that means that the people who supported and voted for Trump will NOT be inclined to go into political hibernation now that Trump is elected.
I tell you again: this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to change the course of a nation. Frankly, if this opportunity is squandered, there likely will not be another one in most of our lifetimes.
Stay awake! Pay attention! And hold Donald Trump’s feet to the fire! Because at the end of the day--and after our liberties are demolished and our posterity is languishing in oppression and tyranny--no one will remember if it was a Democrat or Republican that took our liberties from us. All we will remember is that WE LET IT HAPPEN.
Dr. Chuck Baldwin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)